Fokker block: Difference between revisions
Wikispaces>genewardsmith **Imported revision 314535908 - Original comment: ** |
Wikispaces>genewardsmith **Imported revision 317658678 - Original comment: ** |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2> | <h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2> | ||
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br> | This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br> | ||
: This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2012- | : This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2012-04-04 13:15:27 UTC</tt>.<br> | ||
: The original revision id was <tt> | : The original revision id was <tt>317658678</tt>.<br> | ||
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br> | : The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br> | ||
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br> | The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Hence S satisfies the conditions for being a [[Periodic scale|periodic scale]], and since our unit of measurement is the octave, ie we are using log base two to define intervals, the repetition interval 1 represents an octave. This gives us our first definition of Fokker block. | Hence S satisfies the conditions for being a [[Periodic scale|periodic scale]], and since our unit of measurement is the octave, ie we are using log base two to define intervals, the repetition interval 1 represents an octave. This gives us our first definition of Fokker block. | ||
Note that because any ak can be chosen satisfying 0 ≤ ak < P, each Fokker block comes associated not only with various modes, but also [[Dome|domes]], which are variations on the same basic theme. | Note that because any ak can be chosen satisfying 0 ≤ ak < P, each Fokker block comes associated not only with various modes, but also [[Dome|domes]], which are variations on the same basic theme. The collection of all Fokker blocks for any of the allowed values of the ak offsets is an //arena//; a Fokker arena is defined entirely by its set of commas. | ||
=Second definition of a Fokker block= | =Second definition of a Fokker block= | ||
Let is define a new set of vals by uk = P*vk - vk(2)*v1. To apply these vals to S[i], note first that floor((e1*i+a1)/P) = floor(i+a1/P) = i, so that v1(S[i]) = i. Hence for k>1, uk(S[i]) = P*vk(S[i]) - vk(2)*i. Since x-1 < floor(x) ≤ x, we have (ek*i + ak)/P-1 < floor((ek*i + ak)/P) ≤ (ek*i + ak)/P, so that ek*i + ak - P < P*vk(S[i]) ≤ ek*i + ak. Since ek = vk(2), this gives us ak - P < uk(S[i]) ≤ ak. This means that for each of the vals uk, the scale is mapped to a set of P integers. | Let is define a new set of vals by uk = P*vk - vk(2)*v1. To apply these vals to S[i], note first that floor((e1*i+a1)/P) = floor(i+a1/P) = i, so that v1(S[i]) = i. Hence for k>1, uk(S[i]) = P*vk(S[i]) - vk(2)*i. Since x-1 < floor(x) ≤ x, we have (ek*i + ak)/P-1 < floor((ek*i + ak)/P) ≤ (ek*i + ak)/P, so that ek*i + ak - P < P*vk(S[i]) ≤ ek*i + ak. Since ek = vk(2), this gives us ak - P < uk(S[i]) ≤ ak. This means that for each of the vals uk, the scale is mapped to a set of P integers. | ||
The val uk is a linear combination of v1 and vk, which are both vals of the set of commas {c2, c3, ... cn} minus {ck}. Since uk(2)=0, uk is a multiple of the generator step val of a [[Normal lists|normal val list]], or map, for the rank two temperament tempering out {c2, c3, ... ,cn} minus {ck}; in fact it is ∓mGk, where Gk is the generator step val and m is the number of periods to the octave. If we take the wedge product v1∧Gk and reduce it to a [[The wedgie|wedgie]] Wk, then the [[Interior product|interior products]] Wk∨S[i] for i from 1 to P are P distinct vals wi, each of which have wi(2) in a range of P successive values. The Wk are a basis for the [[Minkowski reduced bases for Fokker groups of certain vals|Fokker group]] of v1. It follows that the abstract [[periodic scale]] Wk∨S represents a MOS of the temperament defined by Wk. The Fokker block can be tempered in n-1 distinct rank two temperament ways to n-1 distinct MOS, and this provides another definition of a Fokker block: a periodic JI scale is Fokker if and only if from the rank n JI group it generates it can be tempered in n-1 ways to n-1 distinct MOS. | The val uk is a linear combination of v1 and vk, which are both vals of the set of commas {c2, c3, ... cn} minus {ck}. Since uk(2)=0, uk is a multiple of the generator step val of a [[Normal lists|normal val list]], or map, for the rank two temperament tempering out {c2, c3, ... ,cn} minus {ck}; in fact it is ∓mGk, where Gk is the generator step val and m is the number of periods to the octave. If we take the wedge product v1∧Gk and reduce it to a [[The wedgie|wedgie]] Wk, then the [[Interior product|interior products]] Wk∨S[i] for i from 1 to P are P distinct vals wi, each of which have wi(2) in a range of P successive values. The Wk are a basis for the [[Minkowski reduced bases for Fokker groups of certain vals|Fokker group]] of v1. It follows that the abstract [[periodic scale]] Wk∨S represents a MOS of the temperament defined by Wk. The Fokker block can be tempered in n-1 distinct rank two temperament ways to n-1 distinct MOS, and this provides another definition of a Fokker block: a periodic JI scale is Fokker if and only if from the rank n JI group it generates it can be tempered in n-1 ways to n-1 distinct MOS. The arena of the Fokker block is defined equally well by the n-1 wedgies defining the n-1 distinct temperings as by the n-1 commas introduced previously; these are dual points of view: if we take all but one of the n-1 commas, it defines one of the wedgies, and if we take all but one of the wedgies, they define a comma. | ||
=Third definition of a Fokker block= | =Third definition of a Fokker block= | ||
The n-1 vals u2, u3, ..., un defined in the previous section gave us n-1 inequalities ak - P < uk(q) ≤ ak, which apply to any q in the Fokker block. If we restrict q to 1 ≤ q < 2, and regard it as representing a pitch class, then it is associated to a lattice point in an n-1 dimensional vector space, and in that space the n-1 inequalities define the boundries of a parallepiped. The Fokker blocks can be defined as the pitch classes lying within such a paralellepiped. | The n-1 vals u2, u3, ..., un defined in the previous section gave us n-1 inequalities ak - P < uk(q) ≤ ak, which apply to any q in the Fokker block. If we restrict q to 1 ≤ q < 2, and regard it as representing a pitch class, then it is associated to a lattice point in an n-1 dimensional vector space, and in that space the n-1 inequalities define the boundries of a parallepiped. The Fokker blocks can be defined as the pitch classes lying within such a paralellepiped. By moving the parallepipeds around in all ways which retain the same orientation and have the unison inside them, we obtain an arena. | ||
=Fourth definition of a Fokker block= | =Fourth definition of a Fokker block= | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
=Example= | =Example= | ||
==Using a Fokker group basis== | ==Using a Fokker group basis== | ||
Consider the periodic scale S[i] with quasiperiod P = 22 whose values for i from 0 to 22 are 1, 33/32, 16/15, 11/10, 9/8, 75/64, 6/5, 5/4, 165/128, 33/25, 11/8, 45/32, 35/24, 3/2, 99/64, 8/5, 33/20, 12/7, 7/4, 231/128, 15/8, 77/40, 2. By solving for the val, or simply testing to see if the patent val works, we quickly find that v = <22 35 51 62 76| sorts the scale in ascending order. A basis for the commas of this val is {50/49, 55/54, 64/63, 99/98}, and by taking three element subsets we find a basis for the wedgies to be {<<1 9 -2 -6 12 -6 -13 -30 -45 -10||, <<2 -4 -4 -12 -11 -12 -26 2 -14 -20||, <<6 10 10 8 2 -1 -8 -5 -16 -12||, <<2 -4 -4 10 -11 -12 9 2 37 42||}, which is to say, {suprapyth, pajara, hedgehog, pajarous}. Taking Z-linear (integer coefficient) combinations, we quickly find that there are four and only four wedgies which give a Graham complexity for the scale less than 22, which are pajara, magic = pajara+hedgehog-suprapyth-pajarous, orwell = pajara+hedgehog-suprapyth, porcupine = suprapyth+pajarous; hence, S is a Fokker block. | Consider the periodic scale S[i] with quasiperiod P = 22 whose values for i from 0 to 22 are 1, 33/32, 16/15, 11/10, 9/8, 75/64, 6/5, 5/4, 165/128, 33/25, 11/8, 45/32, 35/24, 3/2, 99/64, 8/5, 33/20, 12/7, 7/4, 231/128, 15/8, 77/40, 2. By solving for the val, or simply testing to see if the patent val works, we quickly find that v = <22 35 51 62 76| sorts the scale in ascending order. A basis for the commas of this val is {50/49, 55/54, 64/63, 99/98}, and by taking three element subsets we find a basis for the wedgies to be {<<1 9 -2 -6 12 -6 -13 -30 -45 -10||, <<2 -4 -4 -12 -11 -12 -26 2 -14 -20||, <<6 10 10 8 2 -1 -8 -5 -16 -12||, <<2 -4 -4 10 -11 -12 9 2 37 42||}, which is to say, {suprapyth, pajara, hedgehog, pajarous}. Taking Z-linear (integer coefficient) combinations, we quickly find that there are four and only four wedgies which give a Graham complexity for the scale less than 22, which are pajara, magic = pajara+hedgehog-suprapyth-pajarous, orwell = pajara+hedgehog-suprapyth, porcupine = suprapyth+pajarous; hence, S is a Fokker block, in the pajara-magic-orwell-porcupine arena. | ||
If Q(a,b,c,d) is the ∑(T[i] - μ)^2 quadratic form on a*suprapyth+b*pajara+c*hedgehog+d*pajarous, then explicitly we have Q = 2205.5*a^2 + 880*b^2 + 2904*c^2 + 1254*d^2 + 264*a*b + 2992*a*c - 2574*a*d - 1848*b*c - 440*b*d - 880*c*d. From this we can find Q(pajara) = 880, Q(magic) = 885.5, Q(orwell) = 885.5, and Q(porcupine) = 885.5, with the Graham complexity of S being 21 in magic, orwell and porcupine, and 20 in pajara. If we look at the extrema of a, b, c, and d separately after setting Q = 900, we find they are all less than 2 in absolute value, so we need look no farther than the 27 Z-linear combinations of suprapyth, pajara, hedgehog and pajarous with coefficients less than 2 in absolute value. Had the block not been Fokker, we could have used the analysis of extrema to show it was not. | If Q(a,b,c,d) is the ∑(T[i] - μ)^2 quadratic form on a*suprapyth+b*pajara+c*hedgehog+d*pajarous, then explicitly we have Q = 2205.5*a^2 + 880*b^2 + 2904*c^2 + 1254*d^2 + 264*a*b + 2992*a*c - 2574*a*d - 1848*b*c - 440*b*d - 880*c*d. From this we can find Q(pajara) = 880, Q(magic) = 885.5, Q(orwell) = 885.5, and Q(porcupine) = 885.5, with the Graham complexity of S being 21 in magic, orwell and porcupine, and 20 in pajara. If we look at the extrema of a, b, c, and d separately after setting Q = 900, we find they are all less than 2 in absolute value, so we need look no farther than the 27 Z-linear combinations of suprapyth, pajara, hedgehog and pajarous with coefficients less than 2 in absolute value. Had the block not been Fokker, we could have used the analysis of extrema to show it was not. | ||
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
Hence S satisfies the conditions for being a <a class="wiki_link" href="/Periodic%20scale">periodic scale</a>, and since our unit of measurement is the octave, ie we are using log base two to define intervals, the repetition interval 1 represents an octave. This gives us our first definition of Fokker block.<br /> | Hence S satisfies the conditions for being a <a class="wiki_link" href="/Periodic%20scale">periodic scale</a>, and since our unit of measurement is the octave, ie we are using log base two to define intervals, the repetition interval 1 represents an octave. This gives us our first definition of Fokker block.<br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Note that because any ak can be chosen satisfying 0 ≤ ak &lt; P, each Fokker block comes associated not only with various modes, but also <a class="wiki_link" href="/Dome">domes</a>, which are variations on the same basic theme. <br /> | Note that because any ak can be chosen satisfying 0 ≤ ak &lt; P, each Fokker block comes associated not only with various modes, but also <a class="wiki_link" href="/Dome">domes</a>, which are variations on the same basic theme. The collection of all Fokker blocks for any of the allowed values of the ak offsets is an <em>arena</em>; a Fokker arena is defined entirely by its set of commas.<br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:4:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc2"><a name="Second definition of a Fokker block"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:4 -->Second definition of a Fokker block</h1> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:4:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc2"><a name="Second definition of a Fokker block"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:4 -->Second definition of a Fokker block</h1> | ||
Let is define a new set of vals by uk = P*vk - vk(2)*v1. To apply these vals to S[i], note first that floor((e1*i+a1)/P) = floor(i+a1/P) = i, so that v1(S[i]) = i. Hence for k&gt;1, uk(S[i]) = P*vk(S[i]) - vk(2)*i. Since x-1 &lt; floor(x) ≤ x, we have (ek*i + ak)/P-1 &lt; floor((ek*i + ak)/P) ≤ (ek*i + ak)/P, so that ek*i + ak - P &lt; P*vk(S[i]) ≤ ek*i + ak. Since ek = vk(2), this gives us ak - P &lt; uk(S[i]) ≤ ak. This means that for each of the vals uk, the scale is mapped to a set of P integers.<br /> | Let is define a new set of vals by uk = P*vk - vk(2)*v1. To apply these vals to S[i], note first that floor((e1*i+a1)/P) = floor(i+a1/P) = i, so that v1(S[i]) = i. Hence for k&gt;1, uk(S[i]) = P*vk(S[i]) - vk(2)*i. Since x-1 &lt; floor(x) ≤ x, we have (ek*i + ak)/P-1 &lt; floor((ek*i + ak)/P) ≤ (ek*i + ak)/P, so that ek*i + ak - P &lt; P*vk(S[i]) ≤ ek*i + ak. Since ek = vk(2), this gives us ak - P &lt; uk(S[i]) ≤ ak. This means that for each of the vals uk, the scale is mapped to a set of P integers.<br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
The val uk is a linear combination of v1 and vk, which are both vals of the set of commas {c2, c3, ... cn} minus {ck}. Since uk(2)=0, uk is a multiple of the generator step val of a <a class="wiki_link" href="/Normal%20lists">normal val list</a>, or map, for the rank two temperament tempering out {c2, c3, ... ,cn} minus {ck}; in fact it is ∓mGk, where Gk is the generator step val and m is the number of periods to the octave. If we take the wedge product v1∧Gk and reduce it to a <a class="wiki_link" href="/The%20wedgie">wedgie</a> Wk, then the <a class="wiki_link" href="/Interior%20product">interior products</a> Wk∨S[i] for i from 1 to P are P distinct vals wi, each of which have wi(2) in a range of P successive values. The Wk are a basis for the <a class="wiki_link" href="/Minkowski%20reduced%20bases%20for%20Fokker%20groups%20of%20certain%20vals">Fokker group</a> of v1. It follows that the abstract <a class="wiki_link" href="/periodic%20scale">periodic scale</a> Wk∨S represents a MOS of the temperament defined by Wk. The Fokker block can be tempered in n-1 distinct rank two temperament ways to n-1 distinct MOS, and this provides another definition of a Fokker block: a periodic JI scale is Fokker if and only if from the rank n JI group it generates it can be tempered in n-1 ways to n-1 distinct MOS.<br /> | The val uk is a linear combination of v1 and vk, which are both vals of the set of commas {c2, c3, ... cn} minus {ck}. Since uk(2)=0, uk is a multiple of the generator step val of a <a class="wiki_link" href="/Normal%20lists">normal val list</a>, or map, for the rank two temperament tempering out {c2, c3, ... ,cn} minus {ck}; in fact it is ∓mGk, where Gk is the generator step val and m is the number of periods to the octave. If we take the wedge product v1∧Gk and reduce it to a <a class="wiki_link" href="/The%20wedgie">wedgie</a> Wk, then the <a class="wiki_link" href="/Interior%20product">interior products</a> Wk∨S[i] for i from 1 to P are P distinct vals wi, each of which have wi(2) in a range of P successive values. The Wk are a basis for the <a class="wiki_link" href="/Minkowski%20reduced%20bases%20for%20Fokker%20groups%20of%20certain%20vals">Fokker group</a> of v1. It follows that the abstract <a class="wiki_link" href="/periodic%20scale">periodic scale</a> Wk∨S represents a MOS of the temperament defined by Wk. The Fokker block can be tempered in n-1 distinct rank two temperament ways to n-1 distinct MOS, and this provides another definition of a Fokker block: a periodic JI scale is Fokker if and only if from the rank n JI group it generates it can be tempered in n-1 ways to n-1 distinct MOS. The arena of the Fokker block is defined equally well by the n-1 wedgies defining the n-1 distinct temperings as by the n-1 commas introduced previously; these are dual points of view: if we take all but one of the n-1 commas, it defines one of the wedgies, and if we take all but one of the wedgies, they define a comma.<br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:6:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc3"><a name="Third definition of a Fokker block"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:6 -->Third definition of a Fokker block</h1> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:6:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc3"><a name="Third definition of a Fokker block"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:6 -->Third definition of a Fokker block</h1> | ||
The n-1 vals u2, u3, ..., un defined in the previous section gave us n-1 inequalities ak - P &lt; uk(q) ≤ ak, which apply to any q in the Fokker block. If we restrict q to 1 ≤ q &lt; 2, and regard it as representing a pitch class, then it is associated to a lattice point in an n-1 dimensional vector space, and in that space the n-1 inequalities define the boundries of a parallepiped. The Fokker blocks can be defined as the pitch classes lying within such a paralellepiped.<br /> | The n-1 vals u2, u3, ..., un defined in the previous section gave us n-1 inequalities ak - P &lt; uk(q) ≤ ak, which apply to any q in the Fokker block. If we restrict q to 1 ≤ q &lt; 2, and regard it as representing a pitch class, then it is associated to a lattice point in an n-1 dimensional vector space, and in that space the n-1 inequalities define the boundries of a parallepiped. The Fokker blocks can be defined as the pitch classes lying within such a paralellepiped. By moving the parallepipeds around in all ways which retain the same orientation and have the unison inside them, we obtain an arena.<br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:8:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc4"><a name="Fourth definition of a Fokker block"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:8 -->Fourth definition of a Fokker block</h1> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:8:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc4"><a name="Fourth definition of a Fokker block"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:8 -->Fourth definition of a Fokker block</h1> | ||
| Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:14:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc7"><a name="Example"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:14 -->Example</h1> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:14:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc7"><a name="Example"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:14 -->Example</h1> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:16:&lt;h2&gt; --><h2 id="toc8"><a name="Example-Using a Fokker group basis"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:16 -->Using a Fokker group basis</h2> | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:16:&lt;h2&gt; --><h2 id="toc8"><a name="Example-Using a Fokker group basis"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:16 -->Using a Fokker group basis</h2> | ||
Consider the periodic scale S[i] with quasiperiod P = 22 whose values for i from 0 to 22 are 1, 33/32, 16/15, 11/10, 9/8, 75/64, 6/5, 5/4, 165/128, 33/25, 11/8, 45/32, 35/24, 3/2, 99/64, 8/5, 33/20, 12/7, 7/4, 231/128, 15/8, 77/40, 2. By solving for the val, or simply testing to see if the patent val works, we quickly find that v = &lt;22 35 51 62 76| sorts the scale in ascending order. A basis for the commas of this val is {50/49, 55/54, 64/63, 99/98}, and by taking three element subsets we find a basis for the wedgies to be {&lt;&lt;1 9 -2 -6 12 -6 -13 -30 -45 -10||, &lt;&lt;2 -4 -4 -12 -11 -12 -26 2 -14 -20||, &lt;&lt;6 10 10 8 2 -1 -8 -5 -16 -12||, &lt;&lt;2 -4 -4 10 -11 -12 9 2 37 42||}, which is to say, {suprapyth, pajara, hedgehog, pajarous}. Taking Z-linear (integer coefficient) combinations, we quickly find that there are four and only four wedgies which give a Graham complexity for the scale less than 22, which are pajara, magic = pajara+hedgehog-suprapyth-pajarous, orwell = pajara+hedgehog-suprapyth, porcupine = suprapyth+pajarous; hence, S is a Fokker block.<br /> | Consider the periodic scale S[i] with quasiperiod P = 22 whose values for i from 0 to 22 are 1, 33/32, 16/15, 11/10, 9/8, 75/64, 6/5, 5/4, 165/128, 33/25, 11/8, 45/32, 35/24, 3/2, 99/64, 8/5, 33/20, 12/7, 7/4, 231/128, 15/8, 77/40, 2. By solving for the val, or simply testing to see if the patent val works, we quickly find that v = &lt;22 35 51 62 76| sorts the scale in ascending order. A basis for the commas of this val is {50/49, 55/54, 64/63, 99/98}, and by taking three element subsets we find a basis for the wedgies to be {&lt;&lt;1 9 -2 -6 12 -6 -13 -30 -45 -10||, &lt;&lt;2 -4 -4 -12 -11 -12 -26 2 -14 -20||, &lt;&lt;6 10 10 8 2 -1 -8 -5 -16 -12||, &lt;&lt;2 -4 -4 10 -11 -12 9 2 37 42||}, which is to say, {suprapyth, pajara, hedgehog, pajarous}. Taking Z-linear (integer coefficient) combinations, we quickly find that there are four and only four wedgies which give a Graham complexity for the scale less than 22, which are pajara, magic = pajara+hedgehog-suprapyth-pajarous, orwell = pajara+hedgehog-suprapyth, porcupine = suprapyth+pajarous; hence, S is a Fokker block, in the pajara-magic-orwell-porcupine arena.<br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
If Q(a,b,c,d) is the ∑(T[i] - μ)^2 quadratic form on a*suprapyth+b*pajara+c*hedgehog+d*pajarous, then explicitly we have Q = 2205.5*a^2 + 880*b^2 + 2904*c^2 + 1254*d^2 + 264*a*b + 2992*a*c - 2574*a*d - 1848*b*c - 440*b*d - 880*c*d. From this we can find Q(pajara) = 880, Q(magic) = 885.5, Q(orwell) = 885.5, and Q(porcupine) = 885.5, with the Graham complexity of S being 21 in magic, orwell and porcupine, and 20 in pajara. If we look at the extrema of a, b, c, and d separately after setting Q = 900, we find they are all less than 2 in absolute value, so we need look no farther than the 27 Z-linear combinations of suprapyth, pajara, hedgehog and pajarous with coefficients less than 2 in absolute value. Had the block not been Fokker, we could have used the analysis of extrema to show it was not.<br /> | If Q(a,b,c,d) is the ∑(T[i] - μ)^2 quadratic form on a*suprapyth+b*pajara+c*hedgehog+d*pajarous, then explicitly we have Q = 2205.5*a^2 + 880*b^2 + 2904*c^2 + 1254*d^2 + 264*a*b + 2992*a*c - 2574*a*d - 1848*b*c - 440*b*d - 880*c*d. From this we can find Q(pajara) = 880, Q(magic) = 885.5, Q(orwell) = 885.5, and Q(porcupine) = 885.5, with the Graham complexity of S being 21 in magic, orwell and porcupine, and 20 in pajara. If we look at the extrema of a, b, c, and d separately after setting Q = 900, we find they are all less than 2 in absolute value, so we need look no farther than the 27 Z-linear combinations of suprapyth, pajara, hedgehog and pajarous with coefficients less than 2 in absolute value. Had the block not been Fokker, we could have used the analysis of extrema to show it was not.<br /> | ||