User:2^67-1/Deconstructing MMTM’s Theory: Difference between revisions
Created page with "This is an essay I have written and released on Discord, and I will reiterate it here for the benefit of those who are not on the Discord. == Deconstructing MMTM’s Theory =..." |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Now, most of these scales will be inevitably stretched or compressed. Here, all four scales would be noticeably stretched and as such will not give very diatonic-like interval qualities. | Now, most of these scales will be inevitably stretched or compressed. Here, all four scales would be noticeably stretched and as such will not give very diatonic-like interval qualities. | ||
EDONOIs are particularly simple to derive from the MOSses. If a MOS is aLbs<c> then the corresponding EDONOI is (a+b)EDc. Rather unpleasantly, MMTM likes to give them fancy names like White Oak and Roccocavallo. These all distract from his actual theory, which, as I have shown previously, is ridiculously simple when you take out all the technobabble. | EDONOIs are particularly simple to derive from the MOSses. If a MOS is aLbs<c> then the corresponding EDONOI is (a+b)EDc. Rather unpleasantly, MMTM likes to give them fancy names like White Oak and Roccocavallo. These all distract from his actual theory, which, as I have shown previously, is ridiculously simple when you take out all the technobabble. | ||