Talk:K*N subgroups: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dummy index (talk | contribs) →Termination condition: new section |
Dummy index (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This may cause termination too early. For example... 5-limit 3*24 subgroup of 24edo, I want a result "2.3.125 subgroup", but no additional base at i=2, cause terminating the algorithm and result in "2.3 subgroup". Simply it should be do up to i=k. | This may cause termination too early. For example... 5-limit 3*24 subgroup of 24edo, I want a result "2.3.125 subgroup", but no additional base at i=2, cause terminating the algorithm and result in "2.3 subgroup". Simply it should be do up to i=k. | ||
--[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 13:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC) | --[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 13:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
Hmm, subgroup may be extended by this → <q>add to that a basis for the commas of the k*N patent val</q> | |||
Commas are all unison, 0 is divisible by k, not intrusive. | |||
Ah, before that, 5-limit 24edo is enfactored... Sorry. --[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 14:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:55, 13 June 2024
|
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
Termination condition
When two successive values i and i+1 lead to the same normal list
This may cause termination too early. For example... 5-limit 3*24 subgroup of 24edo, I want a result "2.3.125 subgroup", but no additional base at i=2, cause terminating the algorithm and result in "2.3 subgroup". Simply it should be do up to i=k.
--Dummy index (talk) 13:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Hmm, subgroup may be extended by this → add to that a basis for the commas of the k*N patent val
Commas are all unison, 0 is divisible by k, not intrusive.
Ah, before that, 5-limit 24edo is enfactored... Sorry. --Dummy index (talk) 14:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)