∞edo: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:41, 31 January 2024 view source CompactStar (talk \| contribs) 5,020 edits Removed redirect to Free pitch Tag: Removed redirect ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:46, 31 January 2024 view source BudjarnLambeth (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 18,543 edits Added novelty tag, corrected grammar, added “…probably.” to the end Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	∞edo would be a tuning with a infinite number of notes. However, it would be impossible to use since intervals are spaced like numbers. This means ∞edo recreates all harmonics PERFECTLY. Even the smallest of intervals are recreateable. But, ~~You cant~~ use it. Even if you go up 1 googolplex intervals, you would still have ~~2 NEARLY perfect notes~~. Unfortunately, no songs will ever use this ~~tuning~~.		{{novelty}}

			∞edo would be a tuning with an infinite number of notes. However, it would be impossible to use since intervals are spaced like the real numbers. This means ∞edo recreates all harmonics PERFECTLY. Even the smallest of intervals are recreateable. But, you can’t use it. Even if you go up 1 googolplex intervals, you would still have the same note. Unfortunately, no songs will ever use this tuning… probably.