Cassandra triads: Difference between revisions
Wikispaces>FREEZE No edit summary |
m →Consonance of Cassandra triads: added link to mason green |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The 13:11 and 14:11 dyads both reside near local [[Harmonic_Entropy|harmonic entropy]] maxima due to falling almost halfway between a septimal and a pental consonance. This, as well as the fact that the triadic just approximations are 242:286:364, do not make the Cassandra triads sound appealing as consonances. | The 13:11 and 14:11 dyads both reside near local [[Harmonic_Entropy|harmonic entropy]] maxima due to falling almost halfway between a septimal and a pental consonance. This, as well as the fact that the triadic just approximations are 242:286:364, do not make the Cassandra triads sound appealing as consonances. | ||
However, appearances can be deceiving. I (Mason Green) find that Cassandra triads sound ''great'' harmonically, at least as good as 12edo ones if not better, and I have a theory as to why. | However, appearances can be deceiving. I ([[Mason Green]]) find that Cassandra triads sound ''great'' harmonically, at least as good as 12edo ones if not better, and I have a theory as to why. | ||
There is an ambiguity in how we compute harmonic entropy for triads, depending on whether we use utonal or otonal approximations. The common major triad is otonally a 4:5:6 and utonally a 1 / (10:12:15). Because the otonal form is simpler, it dominates over the utonal form. For the minor triad, the situation is reversed; the minor triad is primarily a utonal 1 / (6:5:4) and secondarily an otonal 10:12:15. | There is an ambiguity in how we compute harmonic entropy for triads, depending on whether we use utonal or otonal approximations. The common major triad is otonally a 4:5:6 and utonally a 1 / (10:12:15). Because the otonal form is simpler, it dominates over the utonal form. For the minor triad, the situation is reversed; the minor triad is primarily a utonal 1 / (6:5:4) and secondarily an otonal 10:12:15. | ||