User:BudjarnLambeth/Generalising equal divisions of the octave: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I think that I am an ideal person to do this, because I ''am'' a beginner, so if I can write a page that even ''I'' can understand, then I think anyone will be able to understand it. | I think that I am an ideal person to do this, because I ''am'' a beginner, so if I can write a page that even ''I'' can understand, then I think anyone will be able to understand it. | ||
== EDO (equal divisions of the octave) == | == EDO (equal divisions of the octave) == | ||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
Collectively, every EDn falls under the umbrella of '''[[equal-step tuning]]s'''. | Collectively, every EDn falls under the umbrella of '''[[equal-step tuning]]s'''. | ||
== EPDn (equal pitch divisions of n) == | == EPDn (equal pitch divisions of n) == | ||
So far we’ve been dividing the pitch space of our interval into equal slices. So another way you could say '''12EDO''' or 12ED2/1, is '''12EPDO''' or 12EPD2/1. Another way you could say 10ED5/4 is 10EPD5/4. | So far we’ve been dividing the pitch space of our interval into equal slices. So another way you could say '''12EDO''' or 12ED2/1, is '''12EPDO''' or 12EPD2/1. Another way you could say '''10ED5/4''' is '''10EPD5/4'''. | ||