No-fives subgroup temperaments: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) "optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) these can't be Optimal ET sequences, because they're at least not sequenced with increasing complexity, but surely they're at least supporting (and probably uniform); it seemed better to make these lists as consistent as possible with other temperament data; also fix a couple no-legend goofs I made yesterday |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
[[Tp tuning|POL2 generator]]: ~54/49 = 139.848 | [[Tp tuning|POL2 generator]]: ~54/49 = 139.848 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence| 9, 17, 43, 60d }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 9, 17, 43, 60d }} | ||
[[Tp tuning #T2 tuning|RMS error]]: 1.917 cents | [[Tp tuning #T2 tuning|RMS error]]: 1.917 cents | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
[[Tp tuning|POL2 generator]]: ~12/11 = 140.005 | [[Tp tuning|POL2 generator]]: ~12/11 = 140.005 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence| 9, 17, 43, 60d }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 9, 17, 43, 60d }} | ||
[[Tp tuning #T2 tuning|RMS error]]: 1.829 cents | [[Tp tuning #T2 tuning|RMS error]]: 1.829 cents | ||
| Line 742: | Line 742: | ||
[[POTE generator]]: ~[[19/11]] = 945.4 | [[POTE generator]]: ~[[19/11]] = 945.4 | ||
[[ | [[Support]]ing [[ET]]s: 14, 5[+11, +19], 19, 33, 9[-11, -19], 47[-11, -19], 24[+11, +19], 52, 23[--11, --19], 61[-3, -11, -19], 43[+11, +19], 71[-3], 37[-3, --11, --19], 80[-3, -11, -19] | ||
=== Semaerophore === | === Semaerophore === | ||
| Line 753: | Line 753: | ||
[[POTE generator]]: ~[[7/4]] = 944.667 | [[POTE generator]]: ~[[7/4]] = 944.667 | ||
[[ | [[Support]]ing [[ET]]s: 14, 5[+11, +19], 19, 9[-11, -19], 33[-7], 47[-7, -11, -19], 23[-7, --11, --19], 61[-3, -7, -11, -19], 37[-3, -7, --11, --19], 75[-3, --7, -11, --19], 89[-3, --7, --11, --19] | ||