60th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions

Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 50: Line 50:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~216/175 = 364.387
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~216/175 = 364.387


Vals: {{EDOs|540, 1380, 1920, 2460, 3000, 3840, 4380, 4920, 6300, 6840e}}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|540, 1380, 1920, 2460, 3000, 3840, 4380, 4920, 6300, 6840e}}


=== 19-limit ===
=== 19-limit ===
Line 79: Line 79:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~7533637632/6103515625 = 364.385
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~7533637632/6103515625 = 364.385


Vals: {{EDOs|540jn, 1380jn, 1920, 2460, 3000jjnn, 3840jn, 4920jn 4380, 6300, 6840}}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|540jn, 1380jn, 1920, 2460, 3000jjnn, 3840jn, 4920jn 4380, 6300, 6840}}


==== 2.3.5.7.29.43 subgroup ====
==== 2.3.5.7.29.43 subgroup ====