Sensamagic clan: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
add unchanged-intervals along with eigenmonzo, per prior agreement on Xenwiki Work Group
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 14: Line 14:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3 = 1\1edt, ~9/7 = 440.4881
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3 = 1\1edt, ~9/7 = 440.4881


[[Optimal GPV sequence]]: [[4edt|b4]], [[9edt|b9]], [[13edt|b13]], [[56edt|b56]], [[69edt|b69]], [[82edt|b82]], [[95edt|b95]]
[[Optimal ET sequence]]: [[4edt|b4]], [[9edt|b9]], [[13edt|b13]], [[56edt|b56]], [[69edt|b69]], [[82edt|b82]], [[95edt|b95]]


=== Overview to extensions ===
=== Overview to extensions ===
Line 60: Line 60:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.383
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.383


{{Val list|legend=1| 19, 27, 46, 157d, 203cd, 249cdd, 295ccdd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 27, 46, 157d, 203cd, 249cdd, 295ccdd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.025622
[[Badness]]: 0.025622
Line 77: Line 77:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.322
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.322


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 19, 27, 46, 111de, 157de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 27, 46, 111de, 157de }}


=== Sensor ===
=== Sensor ===
Line 88: Line 88:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.294
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.294


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 19, 27, 46, 111d, 157d, 268cdd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 27, 46, 111d, 157d, 268cdd }}


Badness: 0.037942
Badness: 0.037942
Line 101: Line 101:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.321
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.321


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 19, 27, 46, 111df, 157df }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 27, 46, 111df, 157df }}


Badness: 0.025575
Badness: 0.025575
Line 114: Line 114:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.365
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.365


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 19, 27, 46, 157df, 203cdff, 249cddff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 27, 46, 157df, 203cdff, 249cddff }}


Badness: 0.022908
Badness: 0.022908
Line 127: Line 127:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.962
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.962


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8d, 19, 27e, 73ee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8d, 19, 27e, 73ee }}


Badness: 0.028680
Badness: 0.028680
Line 140: Line 140:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.945
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.945


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 19, 27e, 46e, 73ee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 27e, 46e, 73ee }}


Badness: 0.020017
Badness: 0.020017
Line 153: Line 153:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.626
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.626


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 19e, 27e, 46, 119c, 165c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19e, 27e, 46, 119c, 165c }}


Badness: 0.029486
Badness: 0.029486
Line 166: Line 166:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.559
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.559


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 19e, 27e, 46, 165cf, 211bccf, 257bccff, 303bccdff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19e, 27e, 46, 165cf, 211bccf, 257bccff, 303bccdff }}


Badness: 0.020789
Badness: 0.020789
Line 179: Line 179:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.551
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.551


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 19eg, 27eg, 46 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19eg, 27eg, 46 }}


Badness: 0.016238
Badness: 0.016238
Line 192: Line 192:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.518
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.518


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 19e, 27, 46ee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19e, 27, 46ee }}


Badness: 0.036835
Badness: 0.036835
Line 205: Line 205:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.506
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.506


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 19e, 27, 46ee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19e, 27, 46ee }}


Badness: 0.023258
Badness: 0.023258
Line 218: Line 218:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~25/22 = 221.605
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~25/22 = 221.605


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 27e, 38d, 65, 157de, 222cde }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27e, 38d, 65, 157de, 222cde }}


Badness: 0.048714
Badness: 0.048714
Line 231: Line 231:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~25/22 = 221.556
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~25/22 = 221.556


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 27e, 38df, 65f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27e, 38df, 65f }}


Badness: 0.033016
Badness: 0.033016
Line 244: Line 244:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~11/10 = 156.692
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~11/10 = 156.692


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8d, …, 38d, 46, 176dde, 222cdde, 268cddee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8d, …, 38d, 46, 176dde, 222cdde, 268cddee }}


Badness: 0.041723
Badness: 0.041723
Line 257: Line 257:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~11/10 = 156.725
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~11/10 = 156.725


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8d, …, 38df, 46 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8d, …, 38df, 46 }}


Badness: 0.026339
Badness: 0.026339
Line 274: Line 274:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~7/5 = 549.944
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~7/5 = 549.944


{{Val list|legend=1| 11cd, 13cd, 24 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 11cd, 13cd, 24 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.190208
[[Badness]]: 0.190208
Line 287: Line 287:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~7/5 = 549.945
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~7/5 = 549.945


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 11cdee, 13cdee, 24 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 11cdee, 13cdee, 24 }}


Badness: 0.082716
Badness: 0.082716
Line 300: Line 300:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~7/5 = 549.958
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~7/5 = 549.958


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 11cdeef, 13cdeef, 24 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 11cdeef, 13cdeef, 24 }}


Badness: 0.049933
Badness: 0.049933
Line 326: Line 326:
: [[Eigenmonzo basis]] ([[unchanged-interval basis]]): 2.3
: [[Eigenmonzo basis]] ([[unchanged-interval basis]]): 2.3


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, 131, 172, 213c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 131, 172, 213c }}


[[Badness]]: 0.068237
[[Badness]]: 0.068237
Line 343: Line 343:
: Eigenmonzo basis (unchanged-interval basis): 2.11/9
: Eigenmonzo basis (unchanged-interval basis): 2.11/9


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 41, 90e, 131e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 90e, 131e }}


Badness: 0.033949
Badness: 0.033949
Line 360: Line 360:
: Eigenmonzo basis (unchanged-interval basis): 2.5
: Eigenmonzo basis (unchanged-interval basis): 2.5


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 41, 90ef, 131ef, 221bdeff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 90ef, 131ef, 221bdeff }}


Badness: 0.024864
Badness: 0.024864
Line 380: Line 380:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~77/75 = 48.828
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~77/75 = 48.828


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 49, 123ce, 172 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 49, 123ce, 172 }}


Badness: 0.162592
Badness: 0.162592
Line 393: Line 393:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~77/75 = 48.822
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~77/75 = 48.822


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 49f, 123ce, 172f, 295ce, 467bccef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 49f, 123ce, 172f, 295ce, 467bccef }}


Badness: 0.082158
Badness: 0.082158
Line 410: Line 410:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~128/105 = 351.049
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~128/105 = 351.049


{{Val list|legend=1| 17, 24, 41, 106d, 147d, 188cd, 335cd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17, 24, 41, 106d, 147d, 188cd, 335cd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.080152
[[Badness]]: 0.080152
Line 423: Line 423:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~11/9 = 351.014
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~11/9 = 351.014


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 17, 24, 41, 106d, 147d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17, 24, 41, 106d, 147d }}


Badness: 0.039444
Badness: 0.039444
Line 436: Line 436:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~11/9 = 351.025
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~11/9 = 351.025


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 17, 24, 41, 106df, 147df }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17, 24, 41, 106df, 147df }}


Badness: 0.030793
Badness: 0.030793
Line 455: Line 455:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~45/32 = 567.720
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~45/32 = 567.720


{{Val list|legend=1| 17, 19, 55c, 74cd, 93cdd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17, 19, 55c, 74cd, 93cdd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.073735
[[Badness]]: 0.073735
Line 472: Line 472:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 439.076
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 439.076


{{Val list|legend=1| 11cd, 30d, 41, 317bcc, 358bcc, 399bcc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 11cd, 30d, 41, 317bcc, 358bcc, 399bcc }}


[[Badness]]: 0.139379
[[Badness]]: 0.139379
Line 485: Line 485:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 439.152
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 439.152


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 11cd, 30d, 41, 153be, 194be, 235bcee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 11cd, 30d, 41, 153be, 194be, 235bcee }}


Badness: 0.070917
Badness: 0.070917
Line 498: Line 498:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 439.119
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 439.119


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 11cdf, 30df, 41 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 11cdf, 30df, 41 }}


Badness: 0.052835
Badness: 0.052835
Line 511: Line 511:
[[Mapping]]: [{{val| 19 0 14 -7 }}, {{val| 0 1 1 2 }}]
[[Mapping]]: [{{val| 19 0 14 -7 }}, {{val| 0 1 1 2 }}]


{{Val list|legend=1| 19, 76bcd, 95, 114, 133, 247b, 380bcd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 76bcd, 95, 114, 133, 247b, 380bcd }}


=== 11-limit ===
=== 11-limit ===
Line 520: Line 520:
Mapping: [{{val| 19 0 14 -7 96 }}, {{val| 0 1 1 2 -1 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 19 0 14 -7 96 }}, {{val| 0 1 1 2 -1 }}]


{{Val list|legend=1| 19, 76bcd, 95, 114e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 76bcd, 95, 114e }}


=== 13-limit ===
=== 13-limit ===
Line 529: Line 529:
Mapping: [{{val| 19 0 14 -7 96 10 }}, {{val| 0 1 1 2 -1 2 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 19 0 14 -7 96 10 }}, {{val| 0 1 1 2 -1 2 }}]


{{Val list|legend=1| 19, 76bcdf, 95, 114e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 76bcdf, 95, 114e }}


== Magus ==
== Magus ==
Line 546: Line 546:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~5/4 = 391.465
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~5/4 = 391.465


{{Val list|legend=1| 46, 95, 141bc, 187bc, 328bbcc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 95, 141bc, 187bc, 328bbcc }}


[[Badness]]: 0.108417
[[Badness]]: 0.108417
Line 559: Line 559:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~5/4 = 391.503
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~5/4 = 391.503


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 46, 95, 141bc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 95, 141bc }}


Badness: 0.045108
Badness: 0.045108
Line 572: Line 572:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~5/4 = 391.366
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~5/4 = 391.366


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 46, 233bcff, 279bccff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 46, 233bcff, 279bccff }}


Badness: 0.043024
Badness: 0.043024
Line 589: Line 589:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.536
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.536


{{Val list|legend=1| 17, 29c, 46, 109, 155, 264b, 419b }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17, 29c, 46, 109, 155, 264b, 419b }}


[[Badness]]: 0.140577
[[Badness]]: 0.140577
Line 602: Line 602:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.554
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.554


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 17, 29c, 46, 109, 264b, 373b, 637bbe }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17, 29c, 46, 109, 264b, 373b, 637bbe }}


Badness: 0.050679
Badness: 0.050679
Line 615: Line 615:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.571
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.571


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 17, 29c, 46, 63, 109 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17, 29c, 46, 63, 109 }}


Badness: 0.032727
Badness: 0.032727
Line 628: Line 628:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.540
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.540


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 17g, 29cg, 46, 109, 155f, 264bfg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17g, 29cg, 46, 109, 155f, 264bfg }}


Badness: 0.026243
Badness: 0.026243
Line 641: Line 641:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.537
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.537


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 17, 29c, 46, 109g, 155fg, 264bfgg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17, 29c, 46, 109g, 155fg, 264bfgg }}


Badness: 0.026774
Badness: 0.026774

Revision as of 16:58, 7 May 2023

The sensamagic clan tempers out the sensamagic comma, 245/243, a triprime comma with no factors of 2, 0 -5 1 2] to be exact. Tempering out 245/243 alone in the full 7-limit leads to a rank-3 temperament, sensamagic, for which 283edo is the optimal patent val.

BPS

The BPS, for Bohlen–Pierce–Stearns, is the 3.5.7 subgroup temperament tempering out 245/243. This subgroup temperament was formerly called the lambda temperament, which was named after the lambda scale.

Subgroup: 3.5.7

Comma list: 245/243

Sval mapping: [1 1 2], 0 -2 1]]

Sval mapping generators: ~3, ~9/7

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3 = 1\1edt, ~9/7 = 440.4881

Optimal ET sequence: b4, b9, b13, b56, b69, b82, b95

Overview to extensions

The full 7-limit extensions' relation to BPS is clearer if the mapping is normalized in terms of 3.5.7.2. In fact, the strong extensions are

The others are weak extensions. See

as well as bohpier, salsa, pycnic, superthird, magus and leapweek discussed below.

Sensi

Sensi tempers out 126/125, 686/675 and 4375/4374 in addition to 245/243, and can be described as the 19 & 27 temperament. It has as a generator half the size of a slightly wide major sixth, which gives an interval sharp of 9/7 and flat of 13/10, both of which can be used to identify it, as 2.3.5.7.13 sensi (sensation) tempers out 91/90. 22/17, in the middle, is even closer to the generator. 46edo is an excellent sensi tuning, and mos scales of 8-, 11-, 19- and 27-tones are available. The name "sensi" is a play on the words "semi-" and "sixth."

Septimal sensi

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 126/125, 245/243

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2], 0 7 9 13]]

Mapping generators: ~2, ~9/7

Wedgie⟨⟨ 7 9 13 -2 1 5 ]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.383

Optimal ET sequence19, 27, 46, 157d, 203cd, 249cdd, 295ccdd

Badness: 0.025622

Sensation

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.13

Comma list: 91/90, 126/125, 169/168

Sval mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 0], 0 7 9 13 10]]

Gencom mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 0 0], 0 7 9 13 0 10]]

Gencom: [2 9/7; 91/90 126/125 169/168]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.322

Optimal ET sequence19, 27, 46, 111de, 157de

Sensor

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 126/125, 245/243, 385/384

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 9], 0 7 9 13 -15]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.294

Optimal ET sequence19, 27, 46, 111d, 157d, 268cdd

Badness: 0.037942

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 91/90, 126/125, 169/168, 385/384

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 9 0], 0 7 9 13 -15 10]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.321

Optimal ET sequence19, 27, 46, 111df, 157df

Badness: 0.025575

17-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17

Comma list: 91/90, 126/125, 154/153, 169/168, 256/255

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 9 0 10], 0 7 9 13 -15 10 -16]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.365

Optimal ET sequence19, 27, 46, 157df, 203cdff, 249cddff

Badness: 0.022908

Sensis

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 56/55, 100/99, 245/243

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 2], 0 7 9 13 4]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.962

Optimal ET sequence8d, 19, 27e, 73ee

Badness: 0.028680

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 56/55, 78/77, 91/90, 100/99

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 2 0], 0 7 9 13 4 10]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.945

Optimal ET sequence19, 27e, 46e, 73ee

Badness: 0.020017

Sensus

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 126/125, 176/175, 245/243

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 -8], 0 7 9 13 31]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.626

Optimal ET sequence19e, 27e, 46, 119c, 165c

Badness: 0.029486

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 91/90, 126/125, 169/168, 352/351

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 -8 0], 0 7 9 13 31 10]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.559

Optimal ET sequence19e, 27e, 46, 165cf, 211bccf, 257bccff, 303bccdff

Badness: 0.020789

17-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17

Comma list: 91/90, 126/125, 136/135, 154/153, 169/168

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 -8 0 -7], 0 7 9 13 31 10 30]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.551

Optimal ET sequence19eg, 27eg, 46

Badness: 0.016238

Sensa

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 55/54, 77/75, 99/98

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 -1], 0 7 9 13 12]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.518

Optimal ET sequence19e, 27, 46ee

Badness: 0.036835

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 55/54, 66/65, 77/75, 143/140

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 -1 0], 0 7 9 13 12 11]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 443.506

Optimal ET sequence19e, 27, 46ee

Badness: 0.023258

Hemisensi

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 126/125, 243/242, 245/242

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 -3], 0 14 18 26 35]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~25/22 = 221.605

Optimal ET sequence27e, 38d, 65, 157de, 222cde

Badness: 0.048714

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 91/90, 126/125, 169/168, 243/242

Mapping: [1 -1 -1 -2 -3 0], 0 14 18 26 35 30]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~25/22 = 221.556

Optimal ET sequence27e, 38df, 65f

Badness: 0.033016

Bisensi

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 121/120, 126/125, 245/243

Mapping: [2 5 7 9 9], 0 -7 -9 -13 -8]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~11/10 = 156.692

Optimal ET sequence8d, …, 38d, 46, 176dde, 222cdde, 268cddee

Badness: 0.041723

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 91/90, 121/120, 126/125, 169/168

Mapping: [2 5 7 9 9 10], 0 -7 -9 -13 -8 -10]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~11/10 = 156.725

Optimal ET sequence8d, …, 38df, 46

Badness: 0.026339

Cohemiripple

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 245/243, 1323/1250

Mapping: [1 -3 -5 -5], 0 10 16 17]]

Wedgie⟨⟨ 10 16 17 2 -1 -5 ]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~7/5 = 549.944

Optimal ET sequence11cd, 13cd, 24

Badness: 0.190208

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 77/75, 243/242, 245/242

Mapping: [1 -3 -5 -5 -8], 0 10 16 17 25]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~7/5 = 549.945

Optimal ET sequence11cdee, 13cdee, 24

Badness: 0.082716

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 66/65, 77/75, 147/143, 243/242

Mapping: [1 -3 -5 -5 -8 -5], 0 -10 -16 -17 -25 -19]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~7/5 = 549.958

Optimal ET sequence11cdeef, 13cdeef, 24

Badness: 0.049933

Bohpier

For the 5-limit version of this temperament, see High badness temperaments #Bohpier.

Bohpier is named after its interesting relationship with the non-octave Bohlen-Pierce equal temperament.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 245/243, 3125/3087

Mapping: [1 0 0 0], 0 13 19 23]]

Wedgie⟨⟨ 13 19 23 0 0 0 ]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~27/25 = 146.474

Minimax tuning:

  • 7-odd-limit: ~27/25 = [0 0 1/19
Eigenmonzo basis (unchanged-interval basis): 2.5
  • 9-odd-limit: ~27/25 = [0 1/13
Eigenmonzo basis (unchanged-interval basis): 2.3

Optimal ET sequence41, 131, 172, 213c

Badness: 0.068237

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 100/99, 245/243, 1344/1331

Mapping: [1 0 0 0 2], 0 13 19 23 12]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~12/11 = 146.545

Minimax tuning:

  • 11-odd-limit: ~12/11 = [1/7 1/7 0 0 -1/14
Eigenmonzo basis (unchanged-interval basis): 2.11/9

Optimal ET sequence41, 90e, 131e

Badness: 0.033949

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 100/99, 144/143, 196/195, 275/273

Mapping: [1 0 0 0 2 2], 0 13 19 23 12 14]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~12/11 = 146.603

Minimax tuning:

  • 13- and 15-odd-limit: ~12/11 = [0 0 1/19
Eigenmonzo basis (unchanged-interval basis): 2.5

Optimal ET sequence41, 90ef, 131ef, 221bdeff

Badness: 0.024864

Music

by Chris Vaisvil:

Triboh

Triboh is named after "Triple Bohlen-Pierce scale", which divides each step of the equal-tempered Bohlen-Pierce scale into three equal parts.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 245/243, 1331/1323, 3125/3087

Mapping: [1 0 0 0 0], 0 39 57 69 85]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~77/75 = 48.828

Optimal ET sequence49, 123ce, 172

Badness: 0.162592

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 245/243, 275/273, 847/845, 1331/1323

Mapping: [1 0 0 0 0 0], 0 39 57 69 85 91]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~77/75 = 48.822

Optimal ET sequence49f, 123ce, 172f, 295ce, 467bccef

Badness: 0.082158

Salsa

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 245/243, 32805/32768

Mapping: [1 1 7 -1], 0 2 -16 13]]

Wedgie⟨⟨ 2 -16 13 -30 15 75 ]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~128/105 = 351.049

Optimal ET sequence17, 24, 41, 106d, 147d, 188cd, 335cd

Badness: 0.080152

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 243/242, 245/242, 385/384

Mapping: [1 1 7 -1 2], 0 2 -16 13 5]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~11/9 = 351.014

Optimal ET sequence17, 24, 41, 106d, 147d

Badness: 0.039444

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 105/104, 144/143, 243/242, 245/242

Mapping: [1 1 7 -1 2 4], 0 2 -16 13 5 -1]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~11/9 = 351.025

Optimal ET sequence17, 24, 41, 106df, 147df

Badness: 0.030793

Pycnic

The fifth of pycnic in size is a meantone fifth, but four of them are not used to reach 5. This has the effect of making the Pythagorean major third, nominally 81/64, very close to 5/4 in tuning, being a cent sharp of it in the POTE tuning for instance. Pycnic has mos of size 9, 11, 13, 15, 17… which contain these alternative thirds, leading to two kinds of major triads, an official one and a nominally Pythagorean one which is actually in better tune.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 245/243, 525/512

Mapping: [1 3 -1 8], 0 -3 7 -11]]

Wedgie⟨⟨ 3 -7 11 -18 9 45 ]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~45/32 = 567.720

Optimal ET sequence17, 19, 55c, 74cd, 93cdd

Badness: 0.073735

Superthird

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 245/243, 78125/76832

Mapping: [1 -5 -5 -10], 0 18 20 35]]

Wedgie⟨⟨ 18 20 35 -10 5 25 ]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 439.076

Optimal ET sequence11cd, 30d, 41, 317bcc, 358bcc, 399bcc

Badness: 0.139379

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 100/99, 245/243, 78125/76832

Mapping: [1 -5 -5 -10 2], 0 18 20 35 4]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 439.152

Optimal ET sequence11cd, 30d, 41, 153be, 194be, 235bcee

Badness: 0.070917

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 100/99, 144/143, 196/195, 1375/1352

Mapping: [1 -5 -5 -10 2 -8], 0 18 20 35 4 32]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~9/7 = 439.119

Optimal ET sequence11cdf, 30df, 41

Badness: 0.052835

Superenneadecal

Superenneadecal is a cousin of enneadecal but sharper fifth is used to temper 245/243.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 245/243, 395136/390625

Mapping: [19 0 14 -7]0 1 1 2]]

Optimal ET sequence19, 76bcd, 95, 114, 133, 247b, 380bcd

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 245/243, 2560/2541, 3773/3750

Mapping: [19 0 14 -7 96]0 1 1 2 -1]]

Optimal ET sequence19, 76bcd, 95, 114e

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 196/195, 245/243, 832/825, 1001/1000

Mapping: [19 0 14 -7 96 10]0 1 1 2 -1 2]]

Optimal ET sequence19, 76bcdf, 95, 114e

Magus

For the 5-limit version of this temperament, see High badness temperaments #Magus.

Magus temperament tempers out 50331648/48828125 (salegu) in the 5-limit. This temperament can be described as 46 & 49 temperament, which tempers out the sensamagic and 28672/28125 (sazoquingu). The alternative extension amigo (43 & 46) tempers out the same 5-limit comma as the magus, but with the starling comma (126/125) rather than the sensamagic tempered out.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 245/243, 28672/28125

Mapping: [1 -2 2 -6], 0 11 1 27]]

Wedgie⟨⟨ 11 1 27 -24 12 60 ]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~5/4 = 391.465

Optimal ET sequence46, 95, 141bc, 187bc, 328bbcc

Badness: 0.108417

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 176/175, 245/243, 1331/1323

Mapping: [1 -2 2 -6 -6], 0 11 1 27 29]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~5/4 = 391.503

Optimal ET sequence46, 95, 141bc

Badness: 0.045108

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 91/90, 176/175, 245/243, 1331/1323

Mapping: [1 -2 2 -6 -6 5], 0 11 1 27 29 -4]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~5/4 = 391.366

Optimal ET sequence46, 233bcff, 279bccff

Badness: 0.043024

Leapweek

Not to be confused with scales produced by leap week calendars such as Symmetry454.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 245/243, 2097152/2066715

Mapping: [1 0 42 -21], 0 1 -25 15]]

Mapping generators: ~2, ~3

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.536

Optimal ET sequence17, 29c, 46, 109, 155, 264b, 419b

Badness: 0.140577

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 245/243, 385/384, 1331/1323

Mapping: [1 0 42 -21 -14], 0 1 -25 15 11]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.554

Optimal ET sequence17, 29c, 46, 109, 264b, 373b, 637bbe

Badness: 0.050679

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 169/168, 245/243, 352/351, 364/363

Mapping: [1 0 42 -21 -14 -9], 0 1 -25 15 11 8]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.571

Optimal ET sequence17, 29c, 46, 63, 109

Badness: 0.032727

17-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17

Comma list: 154/153, 169/168, 245/243, 256/255, 273/272

Mapping: [1 0 42 -21 -14 -9 -34], 0 1 -25 15 11 8 24]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.540

Optimal ET sequence17g, 29cg, 46, 109, 155f, 264bfg

Badness: 0.026243

Leapweeker

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17

Comma list: 136/135, 169/168, 221/220, 245/243, 364/363

Mapping: [1 0 42 -21 -14 -9 39], 0 1 -25 15 11 8 -22]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.537

Optimal ET sequence17, 29c, 46, 109g, 155fg, 264bfgg

Badness: 0.026774