Xenharmonic Wiki

Canou family: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
5,160 edits
add unchanged-intervals along with eigenmonzo, per prior agreement on Xenwiki Work Group
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
5,160 edits
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 28: Line 28:
: [[Eigenmonzo basis]] ([[unchanged-interval basis]]): 2.7/5
: [[Eigenmonzo basis]] ([[unchanged-interval basis]]): 2.7/5


{{Val list|legend=1| 19, 56d, 61d, 75, 80, 94, 99, 212, 292, 311, 410, 1131, 1541b, 1659b }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 56d, 61d, 75, 80, 94, 99, 212, 292, 311, 410, 1131, 1541b, 1659b }}


[[Badness]]: 1.122 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 1.122 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 43: Line 43:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.3458, ~81/70 = 254.6233
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.3458, ~81/70 = 254.6233


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 94, 99, 193, 217, 292, 311, 410, 1131, 1541b }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 94, 99, 193, 217, 292, 311, 410, 1131, 1541b }}


Badness: 0.775 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 0.775 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 56: Line 56:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.3233, ~81/70 = 254.6279
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.3233, ~81/70 = 254.6279


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 94, 99, 118, 193, 217, 292h, 311, 410, 721 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 94, 99, 118, 193, 217, 292h, 311, 410, 721 }}


Badness: 0.548 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 0.548 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 71: Line 71:
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.2115, ~81/70 = 254.6215
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.2115, ~81/70 = 254.6215


{{Val list|legend=1| 94, 99e, 118, 193, 212, 311, 740, 1051d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 94, 99e, 118, 193, 212, 311, 740, 1051d }}


[[Badness]]: 2.04 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 2.04 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 86: Line 86:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.2075, ~81/70 = 254.6183
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.2075, ~81/70 = 254.6183


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 94, 118f, 193f, 212, 217, 311, 740, 1051d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 94, 118f, 193f, 212, 217, 311, 740, 1051d }}


Badness: 2.56 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 2.56 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 99: Line 99:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.2296, ~51/44 = 254.6012
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.2296, ~51/44 = 254.6012


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 94, 118f, 193f, 212g, 217, 311, 740g, 1051dg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 94, 118f, 193f, 212g, 217, 311, 740g, 1051dg }}


Badness: 1.49 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 1.49 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 112: Line 112:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.2355, ~22/19 = 254.5930
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.2355, ~22/19 = 254.5930


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 94, 118f, 193f, 212gh, 217, 311, 740g, 1051dgh }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 94, 118f, 193f, 212gh, 217, 311, 740g, 1051dgh }}


Badness: 1.00 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 1.00 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 127: Line 127:
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.8093, ~64/55 = 254.3378
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.8093, ~64/55 = 254.3378


{{Val list|legend=1| 75e, 80, 99e, 179e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 75e, 80, 99e, 179e }}


[[Badness]]: 4.523 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 4.523 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 140: Line 140:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 703.6228, ~64/55 = 254.3447
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 703.6228, ~64/55 = 254.3447


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 75e, 80, 99ef, 179ef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 75e, 80, 99ef, 179ef }}


Badness: 4.781 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 4.781 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 161: Line 161:
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.4262, ~81/70 = 254.6191
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.4262, ~81/70 = 254.6191


{{Val list|legend=1| 80, 94, 118, 198, 212, 292, 330e, 410 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 80, 94, 118, 198, 212, 292, 330e, 410 }}


[[Badness]]: 2.197 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 2.197 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 174: Line 174:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.4802, ~81/70 = 254.6526
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.4802, ~81/70 = 254.6526


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 80f, 94, 118f, 198, 410 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 80f, 94, 118f, 198, 410 }}


Badness: 2.974 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 2.974 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 187: Line 187:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.4415, ~81/70 = 254.6663
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.4415, ~81/70 = 254.6663


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 94, 118f, 198g, 212g, 292, 410 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 94, 118f, 198g, 212g, 292, 410 }}


Badness: 2.421 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 2.421 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 200: Line 200:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.4030, ~81/70 = 254.6870
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.4030, ~81/70 = 254.6870


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 94, 118f, 198gh, 212gh, 292h, 410, 622ef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 94, 118f, 198gh, 212gh, 292h, 410, 622ef }}


Badness: 2.177 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 2.177 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 215: Line 215:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.5374, ~81/70 = 254.6819
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.5374, ~81/70 = 254.6819


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 80, 94, 118, 174d, 198, 490f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 80, 94, 118, 174d, 198, 490f }}


Badness: 2.701 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 2.701 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 232: Line 232:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.7417, ~15/13 = 254.3382
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.7417, ~15/13 = 254.3382


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 80, 104c, 118f, 198f, 420cff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 80, 104c, 118f, 198f, 420cff }}


Badness: 3.511 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 3.511 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/Canou_family"