Triwellismic temperaments: Difference between revisions

Fredg999 category edits (talk | contribs)
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 18: Line 18:
[[POTE generator]]: ~10125/7168 = 596.247
[[POTE generator]]: ~10125/7168 = 596.247


{{Val list|legend=1| 2, …, 157cd, 159, 320, 799dd, 1119bdd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 2, …, 157cd, 159, 320, 799dd, 1119bdd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.342890
[[Badness]]: 0.342890
Line 31: Line 31:
POTE generator: ~512/363 = 596.248
POTE generator: ~512/363 = 596.248


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 2, …, 157cd, 159, 320 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 2, …, 157cd, 159, 320 }}


Badness: 0.080833
Badness: 0.080833
Line 44: Line 44:
POTE generator: ~55/39 = 596.248
POTE generator: ~55/39 = 596.248


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 2f, …, 157cdf, 159, 320 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 2f, …, 157cdf, 159, 320 }}


Badness: 0.041506
Badness: 0.041506
Line 57: Line 57:
POTE generator: ~24/17 = 596.250
POTE generator: ~24/17 = 596.250


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 2f, …, 157cdf, 159, 320 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 2f, …, 157cdf, 159, 320 }}


Badness: 0.028653
Badness: 0.028653
Line 70: Line 70:
POTE generator: ~24/17 = 596.250
POTE generator: ~24/17 = 596.250


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 2fh, …, 157cdfh, 159, 161, 320 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 2fh, …, 157cdfh, 159, 161, 320 }}


Badness: 0.020593
Badness: 0.020593
Line 83: Line 83:
POTE generator: ~24/17 = 596.249
POTE generator: ~24/17 = 596.249


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 2fh, …, 157cdfh, 159, 320i }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 2fh, …, 157cdfh, 159, 320i }}


Badness: 0.017242
Badness: 0.017242
Line 96: Line 96:
POTE generator: ~24/17 = 596.249
POTE generator: ~24/17 = 596.249


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 2fh, …, 157cdfhj, 159, 320ij }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 2fh, …, 157cdfhj, 159, 320ij }}


Badness: 0.014267
Badness: 0.014267