Gallery of projective tuning space images: Difference between revisions
PreImportHandFixes>Battaglia01 Mike - changed malformed links, removed "thumbnail" png's and replaced with locally generated thumbnails. May create unused files |
m Categorised this uncategorised page |
||
| Line 270: | Line 270: | ||
hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings | hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings | ||
|} | |} | ||
[[Category:Lists]] | |||
[[Category:Graph]] | |||
[[Category:Resources]] | |||
Revision as of 20:21, 23 April 2023
In the following images, unless otherwise specified:
- numerals represent ETs (steps per '2')
- multiple appearances of the same number are different mappings
- rotation of the ET numbers indicates octave stretch of the TOP tuning of the ET (15 cents stretch = 90° clockwise rotation)
- lines are temperaments (where a single comma is tempered out)
- hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings
5-limit
|
{2,3,5} PTS with handwritten annotations
from A Middle Path |
|
Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-04)
projective tuning space based on {2,3,5} numerals at ETs represent steps per '2' hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings |
11-limit subgroups
|
Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-04)
projective tuning space based on {2,3,7} numerals at ETs represent steps per '2' hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings |
|
Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-06)
projective tuning space based on {2,3,7} zoomed way out! |
|
Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-06)
"projective tuning space" "based on" "{2,3,9}" numerals at "ETs" represent steps per '2' hexagons are "contours" of "maximum Tenney-weighted damage" of "TOP tunings" this one is not like the others! 9/3 is considered a different interval than 3, with complexity log(27) rather than log(3), and susceptibility to damage 1/log(27) instead of 1/log(3) -- whatever that means! |
|
Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-06)
projective tuning space based on {2,3,11} numerals at ETs represent steps per '2' hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings |
|
Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-04)
projective tuning space based on {2,5,7} numerals at ETs represent steps per '2' hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings |
|
Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-06)
projective tuning space based on {2,5,9} numerals at ETs represent steps per '2' hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings |
|
Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-06)
projective tuning space based on {2,5,11} numerals at ETs represent steps per '2' hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings |
|
Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-06)
projective tuning space based on {2,7,9} numerals at ETs represent steps per '2' hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings |
|
Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-06)
projective tuning space based on {2,7,11} numerals at ETs represent steps per '2' hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings |
|
Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-06)
projective tuning space based on {2,9,11} numerals at ETs represent steps per '2' hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings |
3.5.7, tritave (3-1) based
|
Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-04)
projective tuning space based on {3,5,7} numerals at ETs represent steps per '3' hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings |