Talk:Tenney–Euclidean tuning: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
::::: I've made another slight modification to something I wrote above, in order to generalize it to apply not only to all-interval optimization tunings like TE and TIPTOP, but also to [[target tunings]]. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC) | ::::: I've made another slight modification to something I wrote above, in order to generalize it to apply not only to all-interval optimization tunings like TE and TIPTOP, but also to [[target tunings]]. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
:::::: I've been studying these tuning techniques a lot recently and think I may end up wanting to revise some of my statements above. Some of them may be just straight up wrong. Sorry for any confusion in the meantime, but I'll share my conclusions as soon as I can, when they're ready for prime time. Ha. Get it, "prime time". --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 00:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC) | |||