Talk:Tenney–Euclidean tuning: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:33, 27 January 2022 view source Cmloegcmluin (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,160 edits →"Frobenius" tuning ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:16, 27 January 2022 view source Cmloegcmluin (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,160 edits →"Frobenius" tuning Newer edit →
Line 165:		Line 165:


	::: Sorry, I know that's a lot, but hopefully it might help things click for some people. I can say, that in my personal case, the name "TE-weighted" has been causing me months of flailing agony basically until I was finally able to put all these insights together at once to see what was off about it. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 06:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)		::: Sorry, I know that's a lot, but hopefully it might help things click for some people. I can say, that in my personal case, the name "TE-weighted" has been causing me months of flailing agony basically until I was finally able to put all these insights together at once to see what was off about it. But of course maybe I’ve still got something wrong, or there are other good ways to think about it that I don’t see yet. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 06:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)