Temperament addition: Difference between revisions

Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
Applications: fix typo and clarify
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
Line 187: Line 187:
=Versus temperament merging=
=Versus temperament merging=


Like [[tempermaent merging]], temperament arithmetic takes temperaments as inputs and finds a new temperament sharing properties of the inputs. And they both can be understood as, in some sense, ''adding'' these input temperaments together.
Like [[temperament merging]], temperament arithmetic takes temperaments as inputs and finds a new temperament sharing properties of the inputs. And they both can be understood as, in some sense, ''adding'' these input temperaments together.


But there is a big difference between temperament arithmetic and merging. Temperament arithmetic is done using ''entry-wise'' addition (or subtraction), whereas merging is done using ''concatenation''. So the temperament sum of mappings with two rows each is a new mapping that still has exactly two rows, while the other hand, the merging of mappings with two rows each is a new mapping that has a total of four rows<ref>At least, this mapping would have a total of four rows before it is reduced. After reduction, it may end up with only three (or two if you map-merged a temperament with itself for some reason).</ref>.
But there is a big difference between temperament arithmetic and merging. Temperament arithmetic is done using ''entry-wise'' addition (or subtraction), whereas merging is done using ''concatenation''. So the temperament sum of mappings with two rows each is a new mapping that still has exactly two rows, while the other hand, the merging of mappings with two rows each is a new mapping that has a total of four rows<ref>At least, this mapping would have a total of four rows before it is reduced. After reduction, it may end up with only three (or two if you map-merged a temperament with itself for some reason).</ref>.