Temperament addition: Difference between revisions

Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
Applications: relegate to footnote
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
Example: link to where correct answer is explained
Line 362: Line 362:




And it's wrong not only because it is clearly enfactored (at least one factor of 2, that is visible in the first vector). The full explanation of why this is the wrong answer is beyond the scope of this example. However, if we now follow through with the instructions described above, we can find the correct answer.
And it's wrong not only because it is clearly enfactored (at least one factor of 2, that is visible in the first vector). The full explanation of why this is the wrong answer is beyond the scope of this example (the nature of correctness here is discussed in the section [[Temperament arithmetic#Arithmetic on non-addable temperaments]]). However, if we now follow through with the instructions described above, we can find the correct answer.


'''1. Find the linear-dependence basis.''' We know where to start: first find the <span style="color: #3C8031;"><math>L_{\text{dep}}</math></span> and put each of these two mappings into a form that includes it explicitly. In this case, their <span style="color: #3C8031;"><math>L_{\text{dep}}</math></span> consists of a single vector: <span style="color: #3C8031;">{{ket|{{map|19 30 44 53}}}}</span>.  
'''1. Find the linear-dependence basis.''' We know where to start: first find the <span style="color: #3C8031;"><math>L_{\text{dep}}</math></span> and put each of these two mappings into a form that includes it explicitly. In this case, their <span style="color: #3C8031;"><math>L_{\text{dep}}</math></span> consists of a single vector: <span style="color: #3C8031;">{{ket|{{map|19 30 44 53}}}}</span>.