Generator form manipulation: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) avoiding enfactoring |
||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
The fact that these tricks have isolated effects on the generator sizes like this makes it straightforward to compose sequences of them, applied one after the other, to attain an incredible variety of valid generator sizes, as you can see in the diagram to the right. | The fact that these tricks have isolated effects on the generator sizes like this makes it straightforward to compose sequences of them, applied one after the other, to attain an incredible variety of valid generator sizes, as you can see in the diagram to the right. | ||
=== avoiding enfactoring === | |||
To avoid enfactoring the mapping, i.e. introducing a common factor in one of the rows, you simply avoid ever replacing a row with a multiple of that row. You always replace a row with a combination of at least one each of two different rows, as in trick 1, or with the row negated, as in trick 2. | |||
== mingen form == | == mingen form == | ||