2000edo: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Newer edit →
VisualWikitext
Wikispaces>genewardsmith
**Imported revision 556818047 - Original comment: **
 
Wikispaces>genewardsmith
**Imported revision 556818065 - Original comment: **
Line 1: Line 1:
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2015-08-17 13:49:57 UTC</tt>.<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2015-08-17 13:50:22 UTC</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>556818047</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>556818065</tt>.<br>
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
Line 8: Line 8:
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">The 2000 equal division divides the octave into 2000 equal parts of exactly 0.6 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 29 limit and a strong 29-limit system; the only smaller edo with a smaller 29-limit [[Tenney-Euclidean temperament measures#TE simple badness|relative error]] being [[1578edo|1578]]. The only ones to beat it in the 23-limit are 1578 and [[1889edo|1889]], and in the 19-limit, nothing smaller defeats it, the first edo to do so being [[2460edo|2460]].
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">The 2000 equal division divides the octave into 2000 equal parts of exactly 0.6 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 29 limit and a strong 29-limit system; the only smaller edo with a smaller 29-limit [[Tenney-Euclidean temperament measures#TE simple badness|relative error]] being [[1578edo|1578]]. The only ones to beat it in the 23-limit are 1578 and [[1889edo|1889]], and in the 19-limit, nothing smaller defeats it, the first edo to do so being [[2460edo|2460]].


2000 = 2^4 * 5^3; some of its divisors are [[10edo|10]], [[16edo|16]], [[25edo|25]], [[50edo|50]], [[80edo|80]], [[100edo|100]], [[125edo|125]] and [[200edo|200]]. also there is the 1000 division of [[millioctave|millioctaves]], where it might be argued that cutting these in half makes for a better system.</pre></div>
2000 = 2^4 * 5^3; some of its divisors are [[10edo|10]], [[16edo|16]], [[25edo|25]], [[50edo|50]], [[80edo|80]], [[100edo|100]], [[125edo|125]] and [[200edo|200]]. Also there is the 1000 division of [[millioctave|millioctaves]], where it might be argued that cutting these in half makes for a better system.</pre></div>
<h4>Original HTML content:</h4>
<h4>Original HTML content:</h4>
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;2000edo&lt;/title&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;The 2000 equal division divides the octave into 2000 equal parts of exactly 0.6 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 29 limit and a strong 29-limit system; the only smaller edo with a smaller 29-limit &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Tenney-Euclidean%20temperament%20measures#TE simple badness"&gt;relative error&lt;/a&gt; being &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/1578edo"&gt;1578&lt;/a&gt;. The only ones to beat it in the 23-limit are 1578 and &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/1889edo"&gt;1889&lt;/a&gt;, and in the 19-limit, nothing smaller defeats it, the first edo to do so being &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/2460edo"&gt;2460&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;2000edo&lt;/title&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;The 2000 equal division divides the octave into 2000 equal parts of exactly 0.6 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 29 limit and a strong 29-limit system; the only smaller edo with a smaller 29-limit &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Tenney-Euclidean%20temperament%20measures#TE simple badness"&gt;relative error&lt;/a&gt; being &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/1578edo"&gt;1578&lt;/a&gt;. The only ones to beat it in the 23-limit are 1578 and &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/1889edo"&gt;1889&lt;/a&gt;, and in the 19-limit, nothing smaller defeats it, the first edo to do so being &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/2460edo"&gt;2460&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2000 = 2^4 * 5^3; some of its divisors are &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/10edo"&gt;10&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/16edo"&gt;16&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/25edo"&gt;25&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/50edo"&gt;50&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/80edo"&gt;80&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/100edo"&gt;100&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/125edo"&gt;125&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/200edo"&gt;200&lt;/a&gt;. also there is the 1000 division of &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/millioctave"&gt;millioctaves&lt;/a&gt;, where it might be argued that cutting these in half makes for a better system.&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</pre></div>
2000 = 2^4 * 5^3; some of its divisors are &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/10edo"&gt;10&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/16edo"&gt;16&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/25edo"&gt;25&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/50edo"&gt;50&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/80edo"&gt;80&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/100edo"&gt;100&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/125edo"&gt;125&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/200edo"&gt;200&lt;/a&gt;. Also there is the 1000 division of &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/millioctave"&gt;millioctaves&lt;/a&gt;, where it might be argued that cutting these in half makes for a better system.&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</pre></div>

Revision as of 13:50, 17 August 2015

IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES

This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:

This revision was by author genewardsmith and made on 2015-08-17 13:50:22 UTC.
The original revision id was 556818065.
The revision comment was:

The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.

Original Wikitext content:

The 2000 equal division divides the octave into 2000 equal parts of exactly 0.6 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 29 limit and a strong 29-limit system; the only smaller edo with a smaller 29-limit [[Tenney-Euclidean temperament measures#TE simple badness|relative error]] being [[1578edo|1578]]. The only ones to beat it in the 23-limit are 1578 and [[1889edo|1889]], and in the 19-limit, nothing smaller defeats it, the first edo to do so being [[2460edo|2460]].

2000 = 2^4 * 5^3; some of its divisors are [[10edo|10]], [[16edo|16]], [[25edo|25]], [[50edo|50]], [[80edo|80]], [[100edo|100]], [[125edo|125]] and [[200edo|200]]. Also there is the 1000 division of [[millioctave|millioctaves]], where it might be argued that cutting these in half makes for a better system.

Original HTML content:

<html><head><title>2000edo</title></head><body>The 2000 equal division divides the octave into 2000 equal parts of exactly 0.6 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 29 limit and a strong 29-limit system; the only smaller edo with a smaller 29-limit <a class="wiki_link" href="/Tenney-Euclidean%20temperament%20measures#TE simple badness">relative error</a> being <a class="wiki_link" href="/1578edo">1578</a>. The only ones to beat it in the 23-limit are 1578 and <a class="wiki_link" href="/1889edo">1889</a>, and in the 19-limit, nothing smaller defeats it, the first edo to do so being <a class="wiki_link" href="/2460edo">2460</a>.<br />
<br />
2000 = 2^4 * 5^3; some of its divisors are <a class="wiki_link" href="/10edo">10</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/16edo">16</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/25edo">25</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/50edo">50</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/80edo">80</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/100edo">100</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/125edo">125</a> and <a class="wiki_link" href="/200edo">200</a>. Also there is the 1000 division of <a class="wiki_link" href="/millioctave">millioctaves</a>, where it might be argued that cutting these in half makes for a better system.</body></html>
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=2000edo&oldid=6365"