User talk:SAKryukov: Difference between revisions

Line 285:

:::::::: The phrase "shooting from the hip" is an actual idiom, but I don't know if you mean to say I'm "speaking or acting rashly, recklessly, or bluntly, without consideration of potential consequences" (which is what the idiom means) or not. I was trying to say that large EDOs like 159edo are one way of approaching a solution to the dilemma you're talking about, and I was trying to tell you why it might as a solution if done right. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 18:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

== 24edo Harmony ==

Hey SA, do you think we have the chance to talk about the harmonic possibilities of 24edo in regards to 11/8 and 16/11 now that you have listened to "Folly of a Drunk"? I mean, judging from the absolute error amounts, I'd say that 24edo approximates 11/8 and 16/11 better than 22edo does... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

: We can, but I'm going to be somewhat busy, will hardly spend so much time. I'd better need to do some calculations before I'm ready to talk; this is a very fast thing but needs some distraction. First of all, I already admitted that my judgment on this EDO was not based on comprehensive considerations, as I only used the comparisons with "just intonation" in a very narrow sense of this expression, only the well-know system 9/8 5/4 4/3 3/2 5/3 15/8, closely related to the common-practice one. I forgot to notice that my own research aimed to produce some extended sets of intervals renders that judgment obsolete. Based on that criteria, my old method of finding the EDOs produced only 12- 19- 31- 41-... -EDOs and missed some other EDOs. That said, I'm ready to reconsider 22-EDO.

: As to “Folly of a Drunk”, it sound absolutely logical to my ear, and nice to hear. The only problem with it is: can you produce and publish some more? :-)

== Wiki ==

Line 371:

Line 378:

[[User talk:SAKryukov/Wiki|Wiki Talk]]

~~== 24edo Harmony ==~~

Hey SA, do you think we have the chance to talk about the harmonic possibilities of 24edo in regards to 11/8 and 16/11 now that you have listened to "Folly of a Drunk"? I mean, judging from the absolute error amounts, I'd say that 24edo approximates 11/8 and 16/11 better than 22edo does... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

: We can, but I'm going to be somewhat busy, will hardly spend so much time. I'd better need to do some calculations before I'm ready to talk; this is a very fast thing but needs some distraction. First of all, I already admitted that my judgment on this EDO was not based on comprehensive considerations, as I only used the comparisons with "just intonation" in a very narrow sense of this expression, only the well-know system 9/8 5/4 4/3 3/2 5/3 15/8, closely related to the common-practice one. I forgot to notice that my own research aimed to produce some extended sets of intervals renders that judgment obsolete. Based on that criteria, my old method of finding the EDOs produced only 12- 19- 31- 41-... -EDOs and missed some other EDOs. That said, I'm ready to reconsider 22-EDO.

~~: As to “Folly of a Drunk”, it sound absolutely logical to my ear, and nice to hear. The only problem with it is: can you produce and publish some more? :-)~~

@@ Line 285: / Line 285: @@
 :::::::: The phrase "shooting from the hip" is an actual idiom, but I don't know if you mean to say I'm "speaking or acting rashly, recklessly, or bluntly, without consideration of potential consequences" (which is what the idiom means) or not.  I was trying to say that large EDOs like 159edo are one way of approaching a solution to the dilemma you're talking about, and I was trying to tell you why it might as a solution if done right.  --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 18:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
+== 24edo Harmony ==
+Hey SA, do you think we have the chance to talk about the harmonic possibilities of 24edo in regards to 11/8 and 16/11 now that you have listened to "Folly of a Drunk"?  I mean, judging from the absolute error amounts, I'd say that 24edo approximates 11/8 and 16/11 better than 22edo does... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
+: We can, but I'm going to be somewhat busy, will hardly spend so much time. I'd better need to do some calculations before I'm ready to talk; this is a very fast thing but needs some distraction. First of all, I already admitted that my judgment on this EDO was not based on comprehensive considerations, as I only used the comparisons with "just intonation" in a very narrow sense of this expression, only the well-know system 9/8 5/4 4/3 3/2 5/3 15/8, closely related to the common-practice one. I forgot to notice that my own research aimed to produce some extended sets of intervals renders that judgment obsolete. Based on that criteria, my old method of finding the EDOs produced only 12- 19- 31- 41-... -EDOs and missed some other EDOs. That said, I'm ready to reconsider 22-EDO.
+: As to &ldquo;Folly of a Drunk&rdquo;, it sound absolutely logical to my ear, and nice to hear. The only problem with it is: can you produce and publish some more? :-)
 == Wiki ==
@@ Line 371: / Line 378: @@
 [[User talk:SAKryukov/Wiki|Wiki Talk]]
-== 24edo Harmony ==
-Hey SA, do you think we have the chance to talk about the harmonic possibilities of 24edo in regards to 11/8 and 16/11 now that you have listened to "Folly of a Drunk"?  I mean, judging from the absolute error amounts, I'd say that 24edo approximates 11/8 and 16/11 better than 22edo does... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
-: We can, but I'm going to be somewhat busy, will hardly spend so much time. I'd better need to do some calculations before I'm ready to talk; this is a very fast thing but needs some distraction. First of all, I already admitted that my judgment on this EDO was not based on comprehensive considerations, as I only used the comparisons with "just intonation" in a very narrow sense of this expression, only the well-know system 9/8 5/4 4/3 3/2 5/3 15/8, closely related to the common-practice one. I forgot to notice that my own research aimed to produce some extended sets of intervals renders that judgment obsolete. Based on that criteria, my old method of finding the EDOs produced only 12- 19- 31- 41-... -EDOs and missed some other EDOs. That said, I'm ready to reconsider 22-EDO.
-: As to &ldquo;Folly of a Drunk&rdquo;, it sound absolutely logical to my ear, and nice to hear. The only problem with it is: can you produce and publish some more? :-)