Tetrachord: Difference between revisions

Wikispaces>Andrew_Heathwaite
**Imported revision 87915917 - Original comment: **
Wikispaces>seraph57
**Imported revision 105683597 - Original comment: link to my blog entry**
Line 1: Line 1:
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:Andrew_Heathwaite|Andrew_Heathwaite]] and made on <tt>2009-09-09 12:58:37 UTC</tt>.<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:seraph57|seraph57]] and made on <tt>2009-11-27 18:06:57 UTC</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>87915917</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>105683597</tt>.<br>
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
: The revision comment was: <tt>link to my blog entry</tt><br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
<h4>Original Wikitext content:</h4>
<h4>Original Wikitext content:</h4>
Line 155: Line 155:
A composer may choose to treat other-than-perfect fourths as material for constructing tetrachords. Some of the low-number equal temperaments contain diminished or augmented fourths, but nothing resembling a perfect fourth: [[6edo]], [[8edo]], [[9edo]], [[11edo]], [[13edo]], [[16edo]]. Also, one may divide a just other-than-perfect fourth, such as 21/16, 43/32, 26/19, 11/8. At what point does the concept of "tetrachord" stop being useful?
A composer may choose to treat other-than-perfect fourths as material for constructing tetrachords. Some of the low-number equal temperaments contain diminished or augmented fourths, but nothing resembling a perfect fourth: [[6edo]], [[8edo]], [[9edo]], [[11edo]], [[13edo]], [[16edo]]. Also, one may divide a just other-than-perfect fourth, such as 21/16, 43/32, 26/19, 11/8. At what point does the concept of "tetrachord" stop being useful?


=Tetrachords And Non-Octave Scales=
An example:
[[http://www.seraph.it/dep/det/GloriousGuitars.mp3|Glorious Guitars]] by [[Carlo Serafini]] ([[http://www.seraph.it/blog_files/e8a36018d6b782c8ff7bc2416fa7ea5b-47.html|blog entry]])


=More Than Three Divisions=  
=More Than Three Divisions=  
Line 552: Line 556:
A composer may choose to treat other-than-perfect fourths as material for constructing tetrachords. Some of the low-number equal temperaments contain diminished or augmented fourths, but nothing resembling a perfect fourth: &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/6edo"&gt;6edo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/8edo"&gt;8edo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/9edo"&gt;9edo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/11edo"&gt;11edo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/13edo"&gt;13edo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/16edo"&gt;16edo&lt;/a&gt;. Also, one may divide a just other-than-perfect fourth, such as 21/16, 43/32, 26/19, 11/8. At what point does the concept of &amp;quot;tetrachord&amp;quot; stop being useful?&lt;br /&gt;
A composer may choose to treat other-than-perfect fourths as material for constructing tetrachords. Some of the low-number equal temperaments contain diminished or augmented fourths, but nothing resembling a perfect fourth: &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/6edo"&gt;6edo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/8edo"&gt;8edo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/9edo"&gt;9edo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/11edo"&gt;11edo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/13edo"&gt;13edo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/16edo"&gt;16edo&lt;/a&gt;. Also, one may divide a just other-than-perfect fourth, such as 21/16, 43/32, 26/19, 11/8. At what point does the concept of &amp;quot;tetrachord&amp;quot; stop being useful?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:26:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc13"&gt;&lt;a name="Tetrachords And Non-Octave Scales"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:26 --&gt;Tetrachords And Non-Octave Scales&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://www.seraph.it/dep/det/GloriousGuitars.mp3" rel="nofollow"&gt;Glorious Guitars&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Carlo%20Serafini"&gt;Carlo Serafini&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://www.seraph.it/blog_files/e8a36018d6b782c8ff7bc2416fa7ea5b-47.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;blog entry&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:26:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc13"&gt;&lt;a name="More Than Three Divisions"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:26 --&gt;More Than Three Divisions&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:28:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc14"&gt;&lt;a name="More Than Three Divisions"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:28 --&gt;More Than Three Divisions&lt;/h1&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
If you chop a fourth up into more than three steps, is it still useful to call it a &amp;quot;tetrachord&amp;quot;? I don't know, and barely care. If you find it useful, do it!&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</pre></div>
If you chop a fourth up into more than three steps, is it still useful to call it a &amp;quot;tetrachord&amp;quot;? I don't know, and barely care. If you find it useful, do it!&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</pre></div>