Kite's thoughts on pergens: Difference between revisions

Wikispaces>TallKite
**Imported revision 624585795 - Original comment: **
Wikispaces>TallKite
**Imported revision 624714873 - Original comment: **
Line 1: Line 1:
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:TallKite|TallKite]] and made on <tt>2018-01-08 18:17:15 UTC</tt>.<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:TallKite|TallKite]] and made on <tt>2018-01-11 03:13:28 UTC</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>624585795</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>624714873</tt>.<br>
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
Line 294: Line 294:


To find an example of a temperament with a specific pergen, we must find the comma(s) the temperament tempers out. To construct a comma that creates a single-split pergen, find a ratio for P or G that contains only one higher prime, with exponent ±1, of appropriate cents to add up to approximately the octave or the multigen. The comma is the difference between the stacked ratios and the larger interval. For example, (P8/4, P5) requires a P of about 300¢. The comma is the difference between 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;P and P8. If P is 6/5, the comma is 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;P - P8 = (6/5)&lt;span style="vertical-align: super;"&gt;4&lt;/span&gt; / (2/1) = 648/625. If P is 7/6, the comma is P8 - 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;P = (2/1) · (7/6)&lt;span style="vertical-align: super;"&gt;-4&lt;/span&gt;. Neither 13/11 nor 32/27 would work for P, too many and too few higher primes respectively. (P8, P4/3) requires a G of about (498¢)/3 = 166¢, perhaps 10/9. The comma is 3&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;G - P4 = (10/9)^3 / (4/3) = 250/243.
To find an example of a temperament with a specific pergen, we must find the comma(s) the temperament tempers out. To construct a comma that creates a single-split pergen, find a ratio for P or G that contains only one higher prime, with exponent ±1, of appropriate cents to add up to approximately the octave or the multigen. The comma is the difference between the stacked ratios and the larger interval. For example, (P8/4, P5) requires a P of about 300¢. The comma is the difference between 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;P and P8. If P is 6/5, the comma is 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;P - P8 = (6/5)&lt;span style="vertical-align: super;"&gt;4&lt;/span&gt; / (2/1) = 648/625. If P is 7/6, the comma is P8 - 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;P = (2/1) · (7/6)&lt;span style="vertical-align: super;"&gt;-4&lt;/span&gt;. Neither 13/11 nor 32/27 would work for P, too many and too few higher primes respectively. (P8, P4/3) requires a G of about (498¢)/3 = 166¢, perhaps 10/9. The comma is 3&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;G - P4 = (10/9)^3 / (4/3) = 250/243.
An even easier way is to simply assume that the up symbol equals a convenient comma such as 81/80 or 64/63. Thus for (P8/4, P5), since G = vm3, G is 32/27 ÷ 64/63 = 7/6. This method is notation-dependent: (P8/2, P5) with G = vA4 and ^1 = 81/80 gives G = 45/32, but if G = ^4, then G = 27/20.


Finding the comma(s) for a double pergen is trickier. As previously noted, if a pergen's multigen is (a,b), the octave is split into at least |b| parts. Therefore if a pergen (P8/m, (a,b)/n) has m = |b|, it is **explicitly false**. If so, proceed as if the octave were unsplit: (P8/2, M2/4) requires G ~ 50¢, perhaps 33/32, and the comma is 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;G - M2 = (33/32)^4 / (9/8) = (-17, 2, 0, 0, 4).
Finding the comma(s) for a double pergen is trickier. As previously noted, if a pergen's multigen is (a,b), the octave is split into at least |b| parts. Therefore if a pergen (P8/m, (a,b)/n) has m = |b|, it is **explicitly false**. If so, proceed as if the octave were unsplit: (P8/2, M2/4) requires G ~ 50¢, perhaps 33/32, and the comma is 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;G - M2 = (33/32)^4 / (9/8) = (-17, 2, 0, 0, 4).
Line 2,067: Line 2,069:
  &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
To find an example of a temperament with a specific pergen, we must find the comma(s) the temperament tempers out. To construct a comma that creates a single-split pergen, find a ratio for P or G that contains only one higher prime, with exponent ±1, of appropriate cents to add up to approximately the octave or the multigen. The comma is the difference between the stacked ratios and the larger interval. For example, (P8/4, P5) requires a P of about 300¢. The comma is the difference between 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;P and P8. If P is 6/5, the comma is 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;P - P8 = (6/5)&lt;span style="vertical-align: super;"&gt;4&lt;/span&gt; / (2/1) = 648/625. If P is 7/6, the comma is P8 - 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;P = (2/1) · (7/6)&lt;span style="vertical-align: super;"&gt;-4&lt;/span&gt;. Neither 13/11 nor 32/27 would work for P, too many and too few higher primes respectively. (P8, P4/3) requires a G of about (498¢)/3 = 166¢, perhaps 10/9. The comma is 3&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;G - P4 = (10/9)^3 / (4/3) = 250/243.&lt;br /&gt;
To find an example of a temperament with a specific pergen, we must find the comma(s) the temperament tempers out. To construct a comma that creates a single-split pergen, find a ratio for P or G that contains only one higher prime, with exponent ±1, of appropriate cents to add up to approximately the octave or the multigen. The comma is the difference between the stacked ratios and the larger interval. For example, (P8/4, P5) requires a P of about 300¢. The comma is the difference between 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;P and P8. If P is 6/5, the comma is 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;P - P8 = (6/5)&lt;span style="vertical-align: super;"&gt;4&lt;/span&gt; / (2/1) = 648/625. If P is 7/6, the comma is P8 - 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;P = (2/1) · (7/6)&lt;span style="vertical-align: super;"&gt;-4&lt;/span&gt;. Neither 13/11 nor 32/27 would work for P, too many and too few higher primes respectively. (P8, P4/3) requires a G of about (498¢)/3 = 166¢, perhaps 10/9. The comma is 3&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;G - P4 = (10/9)^3 / (4/3) = 250/243.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An even easier way is to simply assume that the up symbol equals a convenient comma such as 81/80 or 64/63. Thus for (P8/4, P5), since G = vm3, G is 32/27 ÷ 64/63 = 7/6. This method is notation-dependent: (P8/2, P5) with G = vA4 and ^1 = 81/80 gives G = 45/32, but if G = ^4, then G = 27/20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the comma(s) for a double pergen is trickier. As previously noted, if a pergen's multigen is (a,b), the octave is split into at least |b| parts. Therefore if a pergen (P8/m, (a,b)/n) has m = |b|, it is &lt;strong&gt;explicitly false&lt;/strong&gt;. If so, proceed as if the octave were unsplit: (P8/2, M2/4) requires G ~ 50¢, perhaps 33/32, and the comma is 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;G - M2 = (33/32)^4 / (9/8) = (-17, 2, 0, 0, 4).&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the comma(s) for a double pergen is trickier. As previously noted, if a pergen's multigen is (a,b), the octave is split into at least |b| parts. Therefore if a pergen (P8/m, (a,b)/n) has m = |b|, it is &lt;strong&gt;explicitly false&lt;/strong&gt;. If so, proceed as if the octave were unsplit: (P8/2, M2/4) requires G ~ 50¢, perhaps 33/32, and the comma is 4&lt;span class="nowrap"&gt;⋅&lt;/span&gt;G - M2 = (33/32)^4 / (9/8) = (-17, 2, 0, 0, 4).&lt;br /&gt;
Line 2,489: Line 2,493:
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:61:&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h2 id="toc15"&gt;&lt;a name="Further Discussion-Misc notes"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:61 --&gt;Misc notes&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:61:&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h2 id="toc15"&gt;&lt;a name="Further Discussion-Misc notes"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:61 --&gt;Misc notes&lt;/h2&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Pergens were discovered by Kite Giedraitis in 2017, and developed with the help of Praveen Venkataramana. Earlier drafts of this article can be found at &lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextUrlRule:3135:http://xenharmonic.wikispaces.com/pergen+names --&gt;&lt;a href="http://xenharmonic.wikispaces.com/pergen+names"&gt;http://xenharmonic.wikispaces.com/pergen+names&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextUrlRule:3135 --&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Pergens were discovered by Kite Giedraitis in 2017, and developed with the help of Praveen Venkataramana. Earlier drafts of this article can be found at &lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextUrlRule:3137:http://xenharmonic.wikispaces.com/pergen+names --&gt;&lt;a href="http://xenharmonic.wikispaces.com/pergen+names"&gt;http://xenharmonic.wikispaces.com/pergen+names&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextUrlRule:3137 --&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;