Cmloegcmluin
Joined 3 March 2019
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
Currywurst44 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
: By that definition, there are no exceptions. But "best tuning" is not strictly defined. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 01:34, 11 October 2026 (UTC) | : By that definition, there are no exceptions. But "best tuning" is not strictly defined. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 01:34, 11 October 2026 (UTC) | ||
::: So another way of writing the quote would be "The map with the overall best tuning accuracy for an EDO will always be the patent val"? You just worded it this way because you prefer the term uniform map to patent val? Originally I interpreted the sentence differently to mean that even if the EDO doesn't use the patent val for its most accurate tuning (by whatever metric), it would still be a uniform map taken from some none edo. Pages like [[23-limit]] often show other uniform maps as the "most accurate" for EDOs (or ETs) which made it confusing. In that case uniform maps are only used to simplify the computation but there could theoretically be a more accurate non uniform map that has been missed. Thanks for clarifying. --[[User:Currywurst44|Currywurst44]] ([[User talk:Currywurst44|talk]]) 15:56, 11 October 2026 (UTC) | |||