User:BudjarnLambeth/The intervals I see as important: Difference between revisions
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
== Table of EDOs by general-purpose efficacy (1–53edo) == | == Table of EDOs by general-purpose efficacy (1–53edo) == | ||
{{Editable user page|You may correct factual errors in the table e.g. incorrect numbers}} | |||
This rates EDOs for ''general'' purposes. It doesn't take into account specialist (but still very valid) use cases like inharmonic timbres, dual-fifths usage, subgroup usage, or taking carefully chosen subsets (eg blackjack). EDOs that look bad on this table might still be very good for one or more of those specialist uses. | This rates EDOs for ''general'' purposes. It doesn't take into account specialist (but still very valid) use cases like inharmonic timbres, dual-fifths usage, subgroup usage, or taking carefully chosen subsets (eg blackjack). EDOs that look bad on this table might still be very good for one or more of those specialist uses. | ||