User:BudjarnLambeth/The intervals I see as important: Difference between revisions
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
This rates EDOs for ''general'' purposes. It doesn't take into account specialist (but still very valid) use cases like inharmonic timbres, dual-fifths usage, subgroup usage, or taking carefully chosen subsets (eg blackjack). EDOs that look bad on this table might still be very good for one or more of those specialist uses. | This rates EDOs for ''general'' purposes. It doesn't take into account specialist (but still very valid) use cases like inharmonic timbres, dual-fifths usage, subgroup usage, or taking carefully chosen subsets (eg blackjack). EDOs that look bad on this table might still be very good for one or more of those specialist uses. | ||
Table created using Claude (I gave it a PDF of the EDO harmonic tables; my prompt is listed below the table). It almost certainly made errors so don't use this as a source for numbers (look at the relevant EDO pages directly, they're linked in the left column. | Table created using Claude (I gave it a PDF of the EDO harmonic tables; my prompt is listed below the table). It almost certainly made errors so don't use this as a source for numbers (look at the relevant EDO pages directly, they're linked in the left column). | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center; font-size:80%;" | {| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center; font-size:80%;" | ||