Chord complexity: Difference between revisions
m replaced deprecated template with nowiki |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) m Update |
||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
1. Given some fundamental frequency ''f'', an ''N''-note chord built from very high harmonics of ''f'' will be a weaker match than an N-note chord built from lower harmonics of ''f''. In other words, 4:5:6 matches "1" better than 5:6:7. This is just a restatement of our definition of the simple complexity above. | 1. Given some fundamental frequency ''f'', an ''N''-note chord built from very high harmonics of ''f'' will be a weaker match than an N-note chord built from lower harmonics of ''f''. In other words, 4:5:6 matches "1" better than 5:6:7. This is just a restatement of our definition of the simple complexity above. | ||
2. Given some fundamental frequency ''f'' and a chord built from ''f''{{ | 2. Given some fundamental frequency ''f'' and a chord built from ''f''{{`s}} harmonics, adding ''another'' note from ''f''{{`s}} harmonics always ''increases'' the strength of the match to ''f''. In other words, 4:5:6:7 matches "1" better than 4:5:6. | ||
The second proposition is the interesting one. It means that the chord 1:2 evokes "1" less than 1:2:3, which is less than 1:2:3:4, and so on, so that the chord 1:2:3:4:... evokes the frequency "1" most strongly. | The second proposition is the interesting one. It means that the chord 1:2 evokes "1" less than 1:2:3, which is less than 1:2:3:4, and so on, so that the chord 1:2:3:4:... evokes the frequency "1" most strongly. | ||