Chord complexity: Difference between revisions

Overthink (talk | contribs)
m replaced deprecated template with nowiki
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
m Update
Line 74: Line 74:
1. Given some fundamental frequency ''f'', an ''N''-note chord built from very high harmonics of ''f'' will be a weaker match than an N-note chord built from lower harmonics of ''f''. In other words, 4:5:6 matches "1" better than 5:6:7. This is just a restatement of our definition of the simple complexity above.
1. Given some fundamental frequency ''f'', an ''N''-note chord built from very high harmonics of ''f'' will be a weaker match than an N-note chord built from lower harmonics of ''f''. In other words, 4:5:6 matches "1" better than 5:6:7. This is just a restatement of our definition of the simple complexity above.


2. Given some fundamental frequency ''f'' and a chord built from ''f''{{-'}}s harmonics, adding ''another'' note from ''f''{{-'}}s harmonics always ''increases'' the strength of the match to ''f''. In other words, 4:5:6:7 matches "1" better than 4:5:6.
2. Given some fundamental frequency ''f'' and a chord built from ''f''{{`s}} harmonics, adding ''another'' note from ''f''{{`s}} harmonics always ''increases'' the strength of the match to ''f''. In other words, 4:5:6:7 matches "1" better than 4:5:6.


The second proposition is the interesting one. It means that the chord 1:2 evokes "1" less than 1:2:3, which is less than 1:2:3:4, and so on, so that the chord 1:2:3:4:... evokes the frequency "1" most strongly.
The second proposition is the interesting one. It means that the chord 1:2 evokes "1" less than 1:2:3, which is less than 1:2:3:4, and so on, so that the chord 1:2:3:4:... evokes the frequency "1" most strongly.