MOS scale: Difference between revisions
Wikispaces>genewardsmith **Imported revision 142436667 - Original comment: ** |
Wikispaces>genewardsmith **Imported revision 142461149 - Original comment: ** |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2> | <h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2> | ||
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br> | This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br> | ||
: This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2010-05-17 | : This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2010-05-17 06:34:11 UTC</tt>.<br> | ||
: The original revision id was <tt> | : The original revision id was <tt>142461149</tt>.<br> | ||
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br> | : The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br> | ||
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br> | The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
An obvious first rough classification of MOS scales is given by the number of elements of the scale - the number of large intervals (L) and the number of small intervals (s). E.g., the diatonic scale in 12-tone equal temperament could be described as [[5L 2s]] (5 large steps and 2 small steps). Since numbers tend to be dry, Graham Breed has proposed a [[MOSNamingScheme|naming scheme for MOS scales]]. | An obvious first rough classification of MOS scales is given by the number of elements of the scale - the number of large intervals (L) and the number of small intervals (s). E.g., the diatonic scale in 12-tone equal temperament could be described as [[5L 2s]] (5 large steps and 2 small steps). Since numbers tend to be dry, Graham Breed has proposed a [[MOSNamingScheme|naming scheme for MOS scales]]. | ||
The analysis of MOS scales in terms of Farey pairs can be reverse engineered starting from this classification. If N = L + s is the number of notes in a period of the MOS, then we may take the two preceding [[http:// | The analysis of MOS scales in terms of Farey pairs can be reverse engineered starting from this classification. If N = L + s is the number of notes in a period of the MOS, then we may take the two preceding [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continued_fraction#Theorem_1|convergents]] to L/N. These will comprise a Farey pair with the mediant equal to L/N. Calling the smaller of the pair a/b and the larger c/d, we have that L/N < g < c/d, since L is the number of large steps. The MOS will be proper if L/N < g <= (L+c)/(N+d), and improper otherwise. | ||
===Blackwood R constant=== | |||
In the context of the "recognizable diatonic" scales deriving from the Farey pair (1/2, 3/5) [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easley_Blackwood,_Jr.|Easley Blackwood Jr.]] defined a characterizing constant R which we may generalize to any MOS as follows. If a/b < g < c/d is a generator with the given Farey pair, take the ratio of relative errors R = (bg - a)/(c - dg). Since this is a ratio of positive numbers, it is positive. As g tends towards a/b it tends to zero, and as g goes to c/d R goes to infinity. When g equals (a + c)/(b + d) it takes the value 1, and the range of propriety is 1/2 <= R <= 2. | |||
When R is less than 1, it represents the ratio in (logarithmic) size between the smaller and the larger step. When it is greater than 1, it is larger/smaller. By replacing g with 1 - g if necessary, we can reduce always to the case where R>1 (or R<1 if we prefer.) | |||
==MOS in equal temperaments== | ==MOS in equal temperaments== | ||
In the special case of an equal temperament, more concrete things about MOS can be stated. | In the special case of an equal temperament, more concrete things about MOS can be stated. | ||
| Line 69: | Line 73: | ||
An obvious first rough classification of MOS scales is given by the number of elements of the scale - the number of large intervals (L) and the number of small intervals (s). E.g., the diatonic scale in 12-tone equal temperament could be described as <a class="wiki_link" href="/5L%202s">5L 2s</a> (5 large steps and 2 small steps). Since numbers tend to be dry, Graham Breed has proposed a <a class="wiki_link" href="/MOSNamingScheme">naming scheme for MOS scales</a>.<br /> | An obvious first rough classification of MOS scales is given by the number of elements of the scale - the number of large intervals (L) and the number of small intervals (s). E.g., the diatonic scale in 12-tone equal temperament could be described as <a class="wiki_link" href="/5L%202s">5L 2s</a> (5 large steps and 2 small steps). Since numbers tend to be dry, Graham Breed has proposed a <a class="wiki_link" href="/MOSNamingScheme">naming scheme for MOS scales</a>.<br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
The analysis of MOS scales in terms of Farey pairs can be reverse engineered starting from this classification. If N = L + s is the number of notes in a period of the MOS, then we may take the two preceding | The analysis of MOS scales in terms of Farey pairs can be reverse engineered starting from this classification. If N = L + s is the number of notes in a period of the MOS, then we may take the two preceding <a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continued_fraction#Theorem_1" rel="nofollow">convergents</a> to L/N. These will comprise a Farey pair with the mediant equal to L/N. Calling the smaller of the pair a/b and the larger c/d, we have that L/N &lt; g &lt; c/d, since L is the number of large steps. The MOS will be proper if L/N &lt; g &lt;= (L+c)/(N+d), and improper otherwise.<br /> | ||
<br /> | |||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:6:&lt;h3&gt; --><h3 id="toc3"><a name="MOS scales-Classification of MOS-Blackwood R constant"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:6 -->Blackwood R constant</h3> | |||
In the context of the &quot;recognizable diatonic&quot; scales deriving from the Farey pair (1/2, 3/5) <a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easley_Blackwood,_Jr." rel="nofollow">Easley Blackwood Jr.</a> defined a characterizing constant R which we may generalize to any MOS as follows. If a/b &lt; g &lt; c/d is a generator with the given Farey pair, take the ratio of relative errors R = (bg - a)/(c - dg). Since this is a ratio of positive numbers, it is positive. As g tends towards a/b it tends to zero, and as g goes to c/d R goes to infinity. When g equals (a + c)/(b + d) it takes the value 1, and the range of propriety is 1/2 &lt;= R &lt;= 2.<br /> | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule: | When R is less than 1, it represents the ratio in (logarithmic) size between the smaller and the larger step. When it is greater than 1, it is larger/smaller. By replacing g with 1 - g if necessary, we can reduce always to the case where R&gt;1 (or R&lt;1 if we prefer.)<br /> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:8:&lt;h2&gt; --><h2 id="toc4"><a name="MOS scales-MOS in equal temperaments"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:8 -->MOS in equal temperaments</h2> | |||
In the special case of an equal temperament, more concrete things about MOS can be stated.<br /> | In the special case of an equal temperament, more concrete things about MOS can be stated.<br /> | ||
In an equal temparement, all intervals - and hence also the intervals L and s - are integer multiples of a smallest unit. (Example: in case of the diatonic scale in 12EDO, L would be 2 and s 1.)<br /> | In an equal temparement, all intervals - and hence also the intervals L and s - are integer multiples of a smallest unit. (Example: in case of the diatonic scale in 12EDO, L would be 2 and s 1.)<br /> | ||
| Line 317: | Line 325: | ||
<span style="color: #0000ee;"> </span><br /> | <span style="color: #0000ee;"> </span><br /> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule: | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:10:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc5"><a name="MOS As Applied To Rhythms"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:10 -->MOS As Applied To Rhythms</h1> | ||
David Canright was the first to suggest Fibonacci Rhythms in 1/1. This lead to Kraig Grady to be the first to apply MOS patterns to rhythms. Two papers on the subject can be found here <a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://anaphoria.com/hora.PDF" rel="nofollow">http://anaphoria.com/hora.PDF</a> and <a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://anaphoria.com/horo2.PDF" rel="nofollow">http://anaphoria.com/horo2.PDF</a><br /> | David Canright was the first to suggest Fibonacci Rhythms in 1/1. This lead to Kraig Grady to be the first to apply MOS patterns to rhythms. Two papers on the subject can be found here <a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://anaphoria.com/hora.PDF" rel="nofollow">http://anaphoria.com/hora.PDF</a> and <a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://anaphoria.com/horo2.PDF" rel="nofollow">http://anaphoria.com/horo2.PDF</a><br /> | ||
MOS structures and thinking can be applied to the design of rhythms as well. See <a class="wiki_link" href="/MOS%20Rhythm%20Tutorial">MOS Rhythm Tutorial</a><br /> | MOS structures and thinking can be applied to the design of rhythms as well. See <a class="wiki_link" href="/MOS%20Rhythm%20Tutorial">MOS Rhythm Tutorial</a><br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule: | <!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:12:&lt;h1&gt; --><h1 id="toc6"><a name="MOSDiagrams"></a><!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:12 --><a class="wiki_link" href="/MOSDiagrams">MOSDiagrams</a></h1> | ||
</body></html></pre></div> | </body></html></pre></div> | ||