Dual-fifth tuning: Difference between revisions
→Dual-fifth edos: Reword a little |
→Dual-fifth edos: Discuss impure octaves |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
We may, heuristically, define dual-fifth edos as those whose [[relative error]] of the third harmonic is greater than 1/3. In that case 1/3 of all edos will be dual-fifth and the other 2/3 will be plain-fifth. | We may, heuristically, define dual-fifth edos as those whose [[relative error]] of the third harmonic is greater than 1/3. In that case 1/3 of all edos will be dual-fifth and the other 2/3 will be plain-fifth. | ||
=== Stretched or compressed edos === | |||
[[Octave stretching]] or [[octave shrinking]] can be used to equally share the error between an edo's best and worst fifths (i.e. bring them both to exactly 50% [[relative error]]). | |||
Here is the amount of error the sharp and flat fifth will both exhibit in some possible dual-fifth edos after they have been stretched/compressed in this way: | |||
* [[16edo]]: 37.50{{c}} | |||
* [[18edo]]: 33.33{{c}} | |||
* [[20edo]]: 30.00{{c}} | |||
* [[23edo]]: 26.09{{c}} | |||
* [[25edo]]: 24.00{{c}} | |||
* [[28edo]]: 21.43{{c}} | |||
* [[30edo]]: 20.00{{c}} | |||
* [[32edo]]: 18.75{{c}} | |||
* [[33edo]]: 18.18{{c}} | |||
* [[35edo]]: 17.14{{c}} | |||
* [[37edo]]: 16.22{{c}} | |||
* [[40edo]]: 15.00{{c}} | |||
* [[42edo]]: 14.29{{c}} | |||
* [[47edo]]: 12.77{{c}} | |||
* [[49edo]]: 12.25{{c}} | |||
* [[52edo]]: 11.54{{c}} | |||
* [[54edo]]: 11.11{{c}} | |||
* [[57edo]]: 10.53{{c}} | |||
* [[59edo]]: 10.17{{c}} | |||
* [[64edo]]: 9.38{{c}} | |||
* [[66edo]]: 9.09{{c}} | |||
* [[69edo]]: 8.70{{c}} | |||
* [[71edo]]: 8.45{{c}} | |||
You can calculate this for any edo by subtracting the smaller fifth from the bigger fifth, then dividing the result by two (i.e., by dividing the size of one edo-step by two). | |||
== Dual-fifth temperaments == | == Dual-fifth temperaments == | ||