28edo: Difference between revisions
Octave compression section |
|||
| Line 493: | Line 493: | ||
So, where pure-octaves 28edo has a flat fifth with 16.2{{c}} error and a sharp fifth with 28.6{{c}} error, 89ed9 instead has a flat fifth with 21.4{{c}} error and a sharp fifth with 21.4{{c}} error. | So, where pure-octaves 28edo has a flat fifth with 16.2{{c}} error and a sharp fifth with 28.6{{c}} error, 89ed9 instead has a flat fifth with 21.4{{c}} error and a sharp fifth with 21.4{{c}} error. | ||
21.4{{c}} error is slightly | 21.4{{c}} error is slightly better than [[23edo]]'s best fifth but slightly worse than [[5edo]]'s. | ||
Some might consider this fifth too bad to use, in which case 89ed9 would be a downgrade from pure-octaves 28edo. | Some might consider this fifth too bad to use, in which case 89ed9 would be a downgrade from pure-octaves 28edo. | ||