Talk:FKH Extended-diatonic Interval Names: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Dual harmonic values?
Dual harmonic values: (Also notation)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
== Dual harmonic values ==
== Dual harmonic values ==


What should we do for naming intervals when a tuning has dual values for a harmonic (most obviously but not limited to dual fifth)?  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 05:51, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
What should we do for naming intervals when a tuning has dual values for a harmonic (most obviously but not limited to dual fifth)? (And how to notate these in a score, with Helmholtz-Ellis or Sagittal or anything else?) [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 05:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:54, 13 July 2025

Please, move this to your section in Interval summary. PiotrGrochowski (info, talk, contribs) 07:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

I disagree, I think in this form it can be kept here. It's a complete essay. Maybe it should be linked from there. --Xenwolf (talk) 07:17, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Dual harmonic values

What should we do for naming intervals when a tuning has dual values for a harmonic (most obviously but not limited to dual fifth)? (And how to notate these in a score, with Helmholtz-Ellis or Sagittal or anything else?) Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk) 05:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)