User:Hkm/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

== ~~Pages that are in the greatest need of fixes (~~Sadbox) ==

== Sadbox ==

Importance of fixing the page is scored out of 5 because i can't stop myself from ranking things. Some reasonably good pages, like [[31edo]], can still have a high score because they get so much attention.

=== ~~Overly mathematical~~ ===

=== Practicality ===

3 [[Wedgies ~~and multivals]]~~

3 Wedgies

5 ~~[[Tenney–Euclidean]]~~

5 TE

5 [[Otonality and utonality]] (what are the musical implications?)

5 Otonality and utonality (what are the musical implications?)

2 [[Balanced word]]

2 Balanced word

2 ~~[[43edo]]~~

2 43ed2

3 ~~[[31edo]]~~ (~~needs to be especially accessible to beginners, which it is not~~)

3 31ed2 (beginner-friendliness)

=== ~~Terribly written~~ ===

=== Writing ===

5 [[Intro to Xenharmonics]] (can be supplemented with user:hkm/Intro_page)

5 Intro to Xenharmonics (can be supplemented with user:hkm/Intro_page)

4 [[Concordance]]

4 Concordance

2 ~~[[29edo]]~~ (needs a clearer focus on essentially tempered chords in the 2.3.7/5.11/5.13/5 subgroup, less focus on temperaments of 29edo, and less trivia)

2 29ed2 (needs a clearer focus on essentially tempered chords in the 2.3.7/5.11/5.13/5 subgroup, less focus on temperaments of 29edo, and less trivia)

4 ~~[[Fokker~~ block]]

4 Periodicity block

3 [[FAQ]]

3 FAQ

=== ~~Unnecessary~~ ===

=== Criticality ===

1 [[Oodako]]

1 Oodako

1 ~~[[Augmented_family#~~Trug]]

1 Trug

1 [[Oviminor]]

1 Oviminor

2 A bunch of stub pages

=== ~~Terrible names~~ ===

=== Naming ===

1 [[1025/1024]]

1 1025/1024

=== ~~Terrible concepts or designs~~ ===

=== Design ===

2 [[Ploidacot]] (~~this is a matter of opinion, so remove if this is too controversial--but we're forcing people to learn new~~ number names ~~for absolutely no reason~~)

2 Ploidacot (why the number names?)

=== ~~Bad formatting~~ ===

=== Formatting ===

2 Practically all edo pages <50 (algorithmically generated material, like GPVs and sagittal notations, should be moved to the GPV and sagittal pages, for example. The interval table gets to stay though)

== Badness ==

We say that is the score of a "step" is equal to 1/(min_cents + (the motion's error in cents)) * badness_penalty**(the complexity of the motion) / critical_divisor. We then say that the score of a "path" is equal to the product of the scores of the steps. The score of a temperament is equal to the sum of the scores of all paths that reach the original interval times those path lengths. The goodness of a temperament is the critical_divisor necessary to get a score of 2. (This also works for scales without JI interpretations; we assign a JI interpretation to each pair of notes and compute the goodness of the best assignment.)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Editable user page}}
-== Pages that are in the greatest need of fixes (Sadbox) ==
+== Sadbox ==
-Importance of fixing the page is scored out of 5 because i can't stop myself from ranking things. Some reasonably good pages, like [[31edo]], can still have a high score because they get so much attention.
-=== Overly mathematical ===
+=== Practicality ===
-[[Wedgies and multivals]]
+Wedgies
-[[Tenney–Euclidean]]
+TE
-[[Otonality and utonality]] (what are the musical implications?)
+Otonality and utonality (what are the musical implications?)
-[[Balanced word]]
+Balanced word
-[[43edo]]
+43ed2
-[[31edo]] (needs to be especially accessible to beginners, which it is not)
+31ed2 (beginner-friendliness)
-=== Terribly written ===
+=== Writing ===
-[[Intro to Xenharmonics]] (can be supplemented with user:hkm/Intro_page)
+Intro to Xenharmonics (can be supplemented with user:hkm/Intro_page)
-[[Concordance]]
+Concordance
-[[29edo]] (needs a clearer focus on essentially tempered chords in the 2.3.7/5.11/5.13/5 subgroup, less focus on temperaments of 29edo, and less trivia)
+29ed2 (needs a clearer focus on essentially tempered chords in the 2.3.7/5.11/5.13/5 subgroup, less focus on temperaments of 29edo, and less trivia)
-[[Fokker block]]
+Periodicity block
-[[FAQ]]
+FAQ
-=== Unnecessary ===
+=== Criticality ===
-[[Oodako]]
+Oodako
-[[Augmented_family#Trug]]
+Trug
-[[Oviminor]]
+Oviminor
 A bunch of stub pages
-=== Terrible names ===
+=== Naming ===
-[[1025/1024]]
+1025/1024
-=== Terrible concepts or designs ===
+=== Design ===
-[[Ploidacot]] (this is a matter of opinion, so remove if this is too controversial--but we're forcing people to learn new number names for absolutely no reason)
+Ploidacot (why the number names?)
-=== Bad formatting ===
+=== Formatting ===
 Practically all edo pages <50 (algorithmically generated material, like GPVs and sagittal notations, should be moved to the GPV and sagittal pages, for example. The interval table gets to stay though)
 == Badness ==
 We say that is the score of a "step" is equal to 1/(min_cents + (the motion's error in cents)) * badness_penalty**(the complexity of the motion) / critical_divisor. We then say that the score of a "path" is equal to the product of the scores of the steps. The score of a temperament is equal to the sum of the scores of all paths that reach the original interval times those path lengths. The goodness of a temperament is the critical_divisor necessary to get a score of 2. (This also works for scales without JI interpretations; we assign a JI interpretation to each pair of notes and compute the goodness of the best assignment.)