Talk:Very low accuracy temperaments: Difference between revisions
Dummy index (talk | contribs) |
Dummy index (talk | contribs) sectioning |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Second, based on x31eq, I have proposed an 11-limit extension of antitonic that tempers out 11/10 instead of 12/11. This only introduces 0.3 cents of additional error over 12/11, and beats it quite handily in parametric badness. I have given it the name Antietam, but maybe the community can come up with a better name. [[User:Bootmii|Bootmii]] ([[User talk:Bootmii|talk]]) 02:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC) | Second, based on x31eq, I have proposed an 11-limit extension of antitonic that tempers out 11/10 instead of 12/11. This only introduces 0.3 cents of additional error over 12/11, and beats it quite handily in parametric badness. I have given it the name Antietam, but maybe the community can come up with a better name. [[User:Bootmii|Bootmii]] ([[User talk:Bootmii|talk]]) 02:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
== Simplest edge cases == | |||
I suddenly have an urge to add a temperament which extends pythagorean to the 5-limit by tempering out 5/4. Should I? [[User:Squib|Squib]] ([[User talk:Squib|talk]]) 05:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC) | I suddenly have an urge to add a temperament which extends pythagorean to the 5-limit by tempering out 5/4. Should I? [[User:Squib|Squib]] ([[User talk:Squib|talk]]) 05:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC) | ||