204ed96: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) Make page |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) m Fix info copied over from 79ed12 and other pages |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Theory == | == Theory == | ||
The 96th harmonic would be extremely wide for an equivalence, so 204ed96 is better thought of as a stretched version of [[31edo]]. Indeed, tuning the 96/1 ratio just instead of 2/1 results in octaves being [[stretched and compressed tuning|stretched]] by about 0.79{{c}}. The local [[The Riemann zeta function and tuning #Optimal octave stretch|zeta peak]] around | The 96th harmonic would be extremely wide for an equivalence, so 204ed96 is better thought of as a stretched version of [[31edo]]. Indeed, tuning the 96/1 ratio just instead of 2/1 results in octaves being [[stretched and compressed tuning|stretched]] by about 0.79{{c}}. The local [[The Riemann zeta function and tuning #Optimal octave stretch|zeta peak]] around 31 is located at 30.978382, which has a step size of 38.737{{c}} and an octave of 1200.837{{c}} (which is compressed by 2.31{{c}}), making 204ed96 extremely close to optimal for 31edo. | ||
=== Harmonics === | === Harmonics === | ||
{{Harmonics in equal| | {{Harmonics in equal|204|96|1|intervals=integer|columns=11}} | ||
{{Harmonics in equal| | {{Harmonics in equal|204|96|1|intervals=integer|columns=12|start=12|collapsed=true|title=Approximation of harmonics in 204ed96 (continued)}} | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||