Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Notability guidelines: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:17, 8 May 2025 view source CompactStar (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,084 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 06:59, 8 May 2025 view source BudjarnLambeth (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 21,271 edits m →Exclusion of theoretical systems that are practical, but not necessarily beneficial: reply Newer edit →
Line 33:		Line 33:

	BTW for alpharabian & axirabian interval situation I agree with what Aura and Margo Schulter had stated. [[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 04:15, 8 May 2025 (UTC)		BTW for alpharabian & axirabian interval situation I agree with what Aura and Margo Schulter had stated. [[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 04:15, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

			: With regards to the kangaroo example, I think the fact that it provides a theoretical framework for understanding 15edo in a way that similar temperaments don't '''''is''''' a benefit. So in my opinion I would say that it is still notable under these guidelines. But I'll wait to see what Sintel says. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 06:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)