Orwell extensions: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* '''Winston''' (22f & 31) – tempering out 66/65, 99/98, 105/104, and 121/120 | * '''Winston''' (22f & 31) – tempering out 66/65, 99/98, 105/104, and 121/120 | ||
The most important of these is tridecimal orwell, which tempers out [[352/351]] and may also be characterized by tempering out [[275/273]] instead. | The most important of these is tridecimal orwell, which tempers out [[352/351]] and may also be characterized by tempering out [[275/273]] instead. Supported by [[53edo|53]], it has the highest accuracy in its approximation of 13/8, but also the highest complexity. The other two extensions have lower complexity, but also lower accuracy. In winston, the ~13/8 is conflated with the ~18/11 and is generally tuned worse than in 31edo as a result of an improved ~18/11. In blair, the ~13/8 is conflated with the ~8/5 and is generally tuned worse than in 22edo as a result of an improved ~8/5. | ||
Another possible path which relates a sense of compromise is to temper out [[169/168]], leading to [[doublethink]]. This has the effect of slicing the generator in two, and is supported by [[44edo|44]], 53, and [[62edo|62]]. | Another possible path which relates a sense of compromise is to temper out [[169/168]], leading to [[doublethink]]. This has the effect of slicing the generator in two, and is supported by [[44edo|44]], 53, and [[62edo|62]]. | ||