The Riemann zeta function and tuning: Difference between revisions

Sintel (talk | contribs)
Removing primes: fix missing minus sign
Sintel (talk | contribs)
Removing primes: Fix EDT record list
Line 686: Line 686:
Multiplying the Z-function by this factor of adjustment gives a Z-function with the prime ''p'' removed from consideration. Zeta peak and zeta integral tunings may then be found as before.
Multiplying the Z-function by this factor of adjustment gives a Z-function with the prime ''p'' removed from consideration. Zeta peak and zeta integral tunings may then be found as before.


Removing 2 leads to increasing adjusted peak values corresponding to edts (division of the [[3/1|{{ordinal|3}}]] harmonic, or "tritave") into {{EDTs| 4, 7, 9, 13, 15, 17, 26, 32, 39, 45, 52, 56, 71, 75, 88, 131, 245, 316,}} … parts. We can also compare zeta peak EDTs with pure and tempered tritaves just like [[#zeta peak edos|zeta peak]] edos. A striking feature of this list is the appearance not only of [[13edt]], the [[Bohlen–Pierce]] division of the tritave, but the multiples 26, 39, and 52 also.
Removing 2 leads to increasing adjusted peak values corresponding to edts (division of the [[3/1|{{ordinal|3}}]] harmonic, or "tritave") into {{EDTs| 4, 7, 9, 13, 15, 17, 26, 32, 39, 56, 69, 75, 88, 131, 245, 316,}} … parts. We can also compare zeta peak EDTs with pure and tempered tritaves just like [[#zeta peak edos|zeta peak]] edos. A striking feature of this list is the appearance not only of [[13edt]], the [[Bohlen–Pierce]] division of the tritave, but the multiples 26, 39, and 52 also.


== Black magic formulas ==
== Black magic formulas ==