Nelinda: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Changed link to go to sintel instead of x31eq which doesn't work |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
4:7:10:13 would serve as the basic chord for such a system, directly analogous to 4:5:6(:7) in "normal" ditave-repeating music and 3:5:7 for BP. This translates without issue to working within a 4.7.10.13 JI subgroup, of which [[640/637]] is a notable comma. | 4:7:10:13 would serve as the basic chord for such a system, directly analogous to 4:5:6(:7) in "normal" ditave-repeating music and 3:5:7 for BP. This translates without issue to working within a 4.7.10.13 JI subgroup, of which [[640/637]] is a notable comma. | ||
Searching in Graham Breed's temperament finder for said comma, we quickly find the {{nowrap|27 & 20}} (with respect to the tetratave) [ | Searching in Graham Breed's temperament finder for said comma, we quickly find the {{nowrap|27 & 20}} (with respect to the tetratave) [https://sintel.pythonanywhere.com/result?subgroup=4.7.10.13&reduce=on&weights=weil&target=&edos=20%2C27&submit_edo=submit&commas= linear temperament], which we could call ''Nelindic''. It has an approximate 16/13 as its generator and forms MOS of 6, 7, and 13 notes for starters, the latter of which yields a good albitonic scale. | ||
[[27ed4]] is an okay tuning for Nelindic (especially with compression), but [[47ed4]] ''really'' knocks it out of the park (similar to 12ed2 vs 31ed2 for 2.3.5). | [[27ed4]] is an okay tuning for Nelindic (especially with compression), but [[47ed4]] ''really'' knocks it out of the park (similar to 12ed2 vs 31ed2 for 2.3.5). | ||