36edo: Difference between revisions
→Mappings: Remove dubious section that has little to do with 36edo |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 421: | Line 421: | ||
The "red unison" and "blue unison" are in fact the same interval (33.333{{c}}), which is actually fairly consonant as a result of being so narrow (it is perceived as a unison, albeit noticeably "out of tune", but still not overly unpleasant). In contrast, most people consider 24edo's 50{{c}} step to sound much more discordant when used as a subminor second. | The "red unison" and "blue unison" are in fact the same interval (33.333{{c}}), which is actually fairly consonant as a result of being so narrow (it is perceived as a unison, albeit noticeably "out of tune", but still not overly unpleasant). In contrast, most people consider 24edo's 50{{c}} step to sound much more discordant when used as a subminor second. | ||
People with perfect (absolute) pitch often have a difficult time listening to xenharmonic and non-12edo scales,since their ability to memorize and become accustomed to the pitches and intervals of 12edo results in other pitches and intervals sounding out of tune. This is not as much of a problem with 36edo, due to its similarity to 12. With practice, it might even be possible to extend one's perfect pitch to be able to recognize blue and red notes. | People with perfect (absolute) pitch often have a difficult time listening to xenharmonic and non-12edo scales, since their ability to memorize and become accustomed to the pitches and intervals of 12edo results in other pitches and intervals sounding out of tune. This is not as much of a problem with 36edo, due to its similarity to 12. With practice, it might even be possible to extend one's perfect pitch to be able to recognize blue and red notes. | ||
=== "Quark" === | === "Quark" === |