User talk:Hkm: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "I don't like this being a red link so I'm just putting some unimportant text here" |
→89edo-92edo tempering out the quartisma: new section |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't like this being a red link so I'm just putting some unimportant text here | I don't like this being a red link so I'm just putting some unimportant text here | ||
== 89edo-92edo tempering out the quartisma == | |||
Originally, the [[89edo]], [[90edo]], [[91edo]], and [[92edo]] articles all mentioned being in a series of four consecutive edos tempering out the [[quartisma]]. I see you've removed it from 90edo recently, and 89edo a while back. When I checked the history, I found that this information was added to these pages by [[User:Aura|Aura]] back in September of 2020. | |||
In my opinion, Aura does seem to have some bias towards its notability, likely since 33/32 is an important interval in [[Alpharabian tuning]]. Nonetheless, if you removed it from the 89edo and 90edo pages, it would be best to remove it from the 91edo and 92edo pages as well. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 17:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:08, 20 March 2026
I don't like this being a red link so I'm just putting some unimportant text here
89edo-92edo tempering out the quartisma
Originally, the 89edo, 90edo, 91edo, and 92edo articles all mentioned being in a series of four consecutive edos tempering out the quartisma. I see you've removed it from 90edo recently, and 89edo a while back. When I checked the history, I found that this information was added to these pages by Aura back in September of 2020.
In my opinion, Aura does seem to have some bias towards its notability, likely since 33/32 is an important interval in Alpharabian tuning. Nonetheless, if you removed it from the 89edo and 90edo pages, it would be best to remove it from the 91edo and 92edo pages as well. --Overthink (talk) 17:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC)