BudjarnLambeth
Joined 22 July 2022
m →Random stuff I’d like to share: Moved stuff to a subpage |
|||
| Line 676: | Line 676: | ||
===Hot takes=== | ===Hot takes=== | ||
* We should take ourselves less seriously: we should have more fun, we should be more silly 🎉 | * '''Silliness:''' We should take ourselves less seriously: we should have more fun, we should be more silly 🎉 | ||
* | * '''Arbitrary numbers:''' It’s fine to explore the 2.3.5.101 [[subgroup]] if you want to. It doesn’t matter that it’s less [[concordant]] than 2.3.5.7. Explore it anyway and see what happens. Do some stuff with [[:Category:Novelties|arbitrary numbers]] that don’t make logical sense and just see what comes of it. That’s where the fun is! (Though do keep a “2.3” or “3.5” in there just to smooth over the gnarliest edges, heehee.) | ||
* | * '''Importance of common names:''' I would prefer to use a temperament [[Temperament naming|named]] something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “countertrihexakleismatic” even if it’s super [[damage|accurate]] and [[badness|technically better]] - a bland name can kill a temperament’s appeal, a fun name can create appeal out of nothing. | ||
* A cheeky little opinion piece I wrote criticising the negative and celebrating the positive ways Western tuning theory has borrowed from the world’s traditions: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter]] | * '''Misrepresentation of traditions:''' A cheeky little opinion piece I wrote criticising the negative and celebrating the positive ways Western tuning theory has borrowed from the world’s traditions: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter]] | ||
* A futile attempt I made to try to begin resolving one of the big behind the scenes debates among wiki editors: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Brainstorming mostly bad ideas to solve the comma naming debate]] | * '''Comma naming debate brainstorm:''' A futile attempt I made to try to begin resolving one of the big behind the scenes debates among wiki editors: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Brainstorming mostly bad ideas to solve the comma naming debate]] | ||
* A list of subgroup interpretations for the first 50 and a bit EDOs: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/How I choose a subgroup for an EDO]] | * '''My preferred EDO subgroups:''' A list of subgroup interpretations for the first 50 and a bit EDOs: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/How I choose a subgroup for an EDO]] | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| Line 699: | Line 699: | ||
* '''[[11/8]], Pluto''', often dismissed outright due to having such a tiny gravitational pull. But it is a whole other type of ‘planet’, the first of a whole new family. When approached on its own terms, it opens up a larger, more diverse solar system than we ever knew existed. | * '''[[11/8]], Pluto''', often dismissed outright due to having such a tiny gravitational pull. But it is a whole other type of ‘planet’, the first of a whole new family. When approached on its own terms, it opens up a larger, more diverse solar system than we ever knew existed. | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
===Integer commas=== | ===Integer commas=== | ||