Harmonic entropy: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>

This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:

: This revision was by author [[User:mbattaglia1|mbattaglia1]] and made on <tt>2014-07-05 03:24:15 UTC</tt>.

: This revision was by author [[User:mbattaglia1|mbattaglia1]] and made on <tt>2014-07-05 03:27:02 UTC</tt>.

: The original revision id was <tt>~~515617058~~</tt>.

: The original revision id was <tt>515617078</tt>.

: The revision comment was: <tt></tt>

The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.

Line 26:

The Harmonic Entropy model is a simple way of quantifying how much an arbitrary chord will exhibit psychoacoustic concordance.

Concordance has often been confused with actual musical consonance, an unfortunate fact made more common by the psychoacoustics literature under the unfortunate name **sensory consonance**. This is not to be confused with the more familiar construct of tonal stability, typically just called "consonance" in Western common practice music theory and sometimes clarified as "musical consonance" in the music cognition literature. To make matters worse, the literature has also at times referred to concordance -- and not tonal stability -- as **tonal consonance**, creating a complete terminological mess. As a result, the term "consonance" has been completely avoided in this article.

Concordance has often been confused with actual musical consonance, an unfortunate fact made more common by the psychoacoustics literature under the unfortunate name **sensory consonance**, most often used to refer to phenomena related to roughness and beatlessness specifically. This is not to be confused with the more familiar construct of tonal stability, typically just called "consonance" in Western common practice music theory and sometimes clarified as "musical consonance" in the music cognition literature. To make matters worse, the literature has also at times referred to concordance -- and not tonal stability -- as **tonal consonance**, often referring to phenomena related to virtual pitch integration, creating a complete terminological mess. As a result, the term "consonance" has been completely avoided in this article.

=Model=

Line 123:

The Harmonic Entropy model is a simple way of quantifying how much an arbitrary chord will exhibit psychoacoustic concordance.

Concordance has often been confused with actual musical consonance, an unfortunate fact made more common by the psychoacoustics literature under the unfortunate name sensory consonance. This is not to be confused with the more familiar construct of tonal stability, typically just called &quot;consonance&quot; in Western common practice music theory and sometimes clarified as &quot;musical consonance&quot; in the music cognition literature. To make matters worse, the literature has also at times referred to concordance -- and not tonal stability -- as tonal consonance, creating a complete terminological mess. As a result, the term &quot;consonance&quot; has been completely avoided in this article.

Concordance has often been confused with actual musical consonance, an unfortunate fact made more common by the psychoacoustics literature under the unfortunate name sensory consonance, most often used to refer to phenomena related to roughness and beatlessness specifically. This is not to be confused with the more familiar construct of tonal stability, typically just called &quot;consonance&quot; in Western common practice music theory and sometimes clarified as &quot;musical consonance&quot; in the music cognition literature. To make matters worse, the literature has also at times referred to concordance -- and not tonal stability -- as tonal consonance, often referring to phenomena related to virtual pitch integration, creating a complete terminological mess. As a result, the term &quot;consonance&quot; has been completely avoided in this article.

<h1 id="toc2"><a name="Model"></a>Model</h1>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
 This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
-: This revision was by author [[User:mbattaglia1|mbattaglia1]] and made on <tt>2014-07-05 03:24:15 UTC</tt>.<br>
+: This revision was by author [[User:mbattaglia1|mbattaglia1]] and made on <tt>2014-07-05 03:27:02 UTC</tt>.<br>
-: The original revision id was <tt>515617058</tt>.<br>
+: The original revision id was <tt>515617078</tt>.<br>
 : The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
 The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 The Harmonic Entropy model is a simple way of quantifying how much an arbitrary chord will exhibit psychoacoustic concordance.
-Concordance has often been confused with actual musical consonance, an unfortunate fact made more common by the&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt; psychoacoustics literature under the unfortunate name &lt;/span&gt;**&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;sensory consonance&lt;/span&gt;**&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;. This is not to be confused with the more familiar construct of tonal stability, typically just called "consonance" in Western common practice music theory and sometimes clarified as "musical consonance" in the music cognition literature. To make matters worse, the literature has also at times referred to concordance -- and not tonal stability -- as &lt;/span&gt;**&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;tonal consonance&lt;/span&gt;**&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;, creating a complete terminological mess. As a result, the term "consonance" has been completely avoided in this article.&lt;/span&gt;
+Concordance has often been confused with actual musical consonance, an unfortunate fact made more common by the&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt; psychoacoustics literature under the unfortunate name &lt;/span&gt;**&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;sensory consonance&lt;/span&gt;**&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;, most often used to refer to phenomena related to roughness and beatlessness specifically. This is not to be confused with the more familiar construct of tonal stability, typically just called "consonance" in Western common practice music theory and sometimes clarified as "musical consonance" in the music cognition literature. To make matters worse, the literature has also at times referred to concordance -- and not tonal stability -- as &lt;/span&gt;**&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;tonal consonance&lt;/span&gt;**&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;, often referring to phenomena related to virtual pitch integration, creating a complete terminological mess. As a result, the term "consonance" has been completely avoided in this article.&lt;/span&gt;
 =Model=
@@ Line 123: / Line 123: @@
 The Harmonic Entropy model is a simple way of quantifying how much an arbitrary chord will exhibit psychoacoustic concordance.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
-Concordance has often been confused with actual musical consonance, an unfortunate fact made more common by the&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt; psychoacoustics literature under the unfortunate name &lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;sensory consonance&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;. This is not to be confused with the more familiar construct of tonal stability, typically just called &amp;quot;consonance&amp;quot; in Western common practice music theory and sometimes clarified as &amp;quot;musical consonance&amp;quot; in the music cognition literature. To make matters worse, the literature has also at times referred to concordance -- and not tonal stability -- as &lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;tonal consonance&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;, creating a complete terminological mess. As a result, the term &amp;quot;consonance&amp;quot; has been completely avoided in this article.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+Concordance has often been confused with actual musical consonance, an unfortunate fact made more common by the&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt; psychoacoustics literature under the unfortunate name &lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;sensory consonance&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;, most often used to refer to phenomena related to roughness and beatlessness specifically. This is not to be confused with the more familiar construct of tonal stability, typically just called &amp;quot;consonance&amp;quot; in Western common practice music theory and sometimes clarified as &amp;quot;musical consonance&amp;quot; in the music cognition literature. To make matters worse, the literature has also at times referred to concordance -- and not tonal stability -- as &lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;tonal consonance&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 1.5;"&gt;, often referring to phenomena related to virtual pitch integration, creating a complete terminological mess. As a result, the term &amp;quot;consonance&amp;quot; has been completely avoided in this article.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:10:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc2"&gt;&lt;a name="Model"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:10 --&gt;Model&lt;/h1&gt;