3/2: Difference between revisions
m Added interwiki |
Add subheadings, reword 1 sentence |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{Wikipedia|Perfect fifth}} | {{Wikipedia|Perfect fifth}} | ||
'''3/2''', the '''just perfect fifth''', is the second largest [[superparticular]] [[interval]], spanning the distance between the 2nd and 3rd | '''3/2''', the '''just perfect fifth''', is the second largest [[superparticular]] [[interval]], spanning the distance between the 2nd and 3rd [[harmonic]]s. It is an interval with low [[harmonic entropy]], and therefore high [[consonance]]. | ||
== Properties == | |||
On a harmonic [[instrument]] (''see [[timbre]]''), the third harmonic is usually the loudest one that is not an octave double of the [[fundamental]], with 3/2 itself being the [[octave reduced]] form of this interval. | |||
In composition, the presence of perfect fifths can provide a "ground" upon which unusual intervals may be placed while still sounding structurally coherent. Given this, systems excluding perfect fifths can sound more "[[xenharmonic]]". | |||
== Usage == | |||
Variations of the perfect fifth (whether [[just]] or not) appear in most [[Approaches to musical tuning|music of the world]]. Treatment of the perfect fifth as consonant [[Historical temperaments|historically precedes]] treatment of the major third—specifically [[5/4]]—as consonant. 3/2 is the simplest [[just intonation]] interval to be very well approximated by [[12edo]], after the [[octave]]. | |||
Producing a [[Chain of fifths|chain of just perfect fifths]] yields [[Pythagorean tuning]]. Since log<sub>2</sub>(3) is an irrational number, a chain of just fifths continues indefinitely and will never returns to the starting note in either direction. Nevertheless, even in xenharmonic circles, the common label "perfect" for this interval retains value in at least some of the [[moment of symmetry]] scales created by this tuning—specifically in the [[TAMNAMS]] system – due to it being an interval that can be thought of as a multiple of the [[period]] plus or minus 0 or 1 [[generator]]s. An example of such a scale is the familiar [[Wikipedia:Diatonic scale #Iteration of the fifth|Pythagorean diatonic scale]]. | |||
=== In regular temperament theory === | |||
3/2 plays a significant role in many [[regular temperament]]s. What follows are some prominent examples, not an exhaustive coverage. | |||
[[Meantone]] temperaments flatten the perfect fifth such that the major third generated by four fifths upward be closer to 5/4—or, in the case of [[quarter-comma meantone]] (see also [[31edo]]), identical. In such systems, and in common practice theory, the perfect fifth consists of four diatonic [[semitone]]s and three chromatic semitones. In [[12edo]], and hence in most discussions these days, this is simplified to seven semitones, which is fitting seeing as 12edo is a system which flattens the perfect fifth by about 2 cents so that the circle close at 12 tones. On the other hand, in [[5-limit]] just intonation, the just perfect fifth consists of four just diatonic semitones of [[16/15]], three just chromatic semitones of [[25/24]], and two syntonic commas of [[81/80]]. | |||
There are also [[superpyth]] (or "superpythagorean") temperaments, which ''sharpen'' the fifth from just so that the interval generated by four fifths upwards is closer to 9/7 and the interval generated by three fifths downnward is closer to 7/6. This also means that intervals such as A–G or C–B♭ approximate 7/4 instead of 9/5. | There are also [[superpyth]] (or "superpythagorean") temperaments, which ''sharpen'' the fifth from just so that the interval generated by four fifths upwards is closer to 9/7 and the interval generated by three fifths downnward is closer to 7/6. This also means that intervals such as A–G or C–B♭ approximate 7/4 instead of 9/5. | ||
Then there is the possibility of [[schismatic]] temperaments, which flatten the perfect fifth such that an approximated 5/4 is generated by stacking eight fifths downwards; however, without a notation system that properly accounts for the syntonic comma (such as [[ups and downs notation]] or [[Syntonic-Rastmic Subchroma notation]]), the 5/4 will be invariably classified as a diminished fourth due to being enharmonic with [[8192/6561]], and this in turn results in common chords such as conventional [[Wikipedia: Major chord| | Then there is the possibility of [[schismatic]] temperaments, which flatten the perfect fifth such that an approximated 5/4 is generated by stacking eight fifths downwards; however, without a [[notation]] system that properly accounts for the syntonic comma (such as [[ups and downs notation]] or [[Syntonic-Rastmic Subchroma notation]]), the 5/4 will be invariably classified as a diminished fourth due to being enharmonic with [[8192/6561]], and this in turn results in common chords such as conventional [[Wikipedia: Major chord|major]] and [[Wikipedia: Minor chord|minor]] triads being awkward to notate. | ||
Some tunings which have better (in terms of closeness to just intonation) approximations of the perfect fifth than in 12edo are [[29edo]], [[41edo]], and [[53edo]]. Of the aforementioned systems, 53edo is particularly noteworthy in regards to [[telicity]] as while 12edo is a 2-strong 3-2 telic system, 53edo is a 3-strong 3-2 telic system. | == Approximations by edos == | ||
Some [[edo]] tunings which have better (in terms of closeness to just intonation) approximations of the perfect fifth than in 12edo are [[29edo]], [[41edo]], and [[53edo]]. Of the aforementioned systems, 53edo is particularly noteworthy in regards to [[telicity]] as while 12edo is a 2-strong 3-2 [[telic]] system, 53edo is a 3-strong 3-2 telic system. | |||
The following [[edo]]s (up to 200) contain good approximations<ref>error magnitude below 7, both, absolute (in ¢) and relative (in r¢)</ref> of the interval 3/2. Errors are given by magnitude, the arrows in the table show if the edo representation is sharp (↑) or flat (↓). | The following [[edo]]s (up to 200) contain good approximations<ref>error magnitude below 7, both, absolute (in ¢) and relative (in r¢)</ref> of the interval 3/2. Errors are given by magnitude, the arrows in the table show if the edo representation is sharp (↑) or flat (↓). | ||