User:Dummy index/Chromatic pairs and how we define haplotonic: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 = Proposal to simplify the definition =
-* In order to distinguish between the fixed category of [[:Category:Haplotonic scales]], etc., and the reciprocal relationship (haplotonic) + (albitonic) = (chromatic), the latter will be called, for example, triplet. Every 3 successive generations of MOS that satisfies the above relationship will be called a triplet.
+* In order to distinguish between the fixed category of [[:Category:Haplotonic scales]], etc., and the reciprocal relationship (haplotonic) + (albitonic) = (chromatic), the latter will be called, for example, MOS triplet. Every 3 successive generations of MOS that satisfies the above relationship will be called a MOS triplet.
+** Or moshaplotonic as a parent MOS, moschromatic as a descendant MOS, like that [[moschroma]] and [[mosdiesis]] are relative from any MOS scale of interest.
 * If the number of notes in the scale is important, consider using the [[Pentatonic]] and [[Heptatonic]] pages.
 * Based on the above equation and the nature of MOS, the chromatic must be a direct descendant of the albitonic. So I don't like the existence of mega-albitonic between albitonic and chromatic, even though the meanings of relational and categorical usages don't have to be exactly the same. (I will also withdraw the mini-albitonic that I said.)