BudjarnLambeth
Joined 22 July 2022
Line 202: | Line 202: | ||
* This: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter]] | * This: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter]] | ||
* We all take ourselves too seriously and should have a little more fun 🎉 | * We all take ourselves too seriously and should have a little more fun 🎉 | ||
* It’s fine to explore the 2.3.5.101 [[subgroup]] if you want to. It doesn’t matter that it’s less [[concordant]] than 2.3.5.7. Explore it anyway and see what happens. Do some stuff with [[:Category:Novelties|arbitrary numbers]] that don’t make logical sense and just see what comes of it. That’s where the fun is! (Though maybe keep a “2.3” or “3.5” in there just to smooth over the | * It’s fine to explore the 2.3.5.101 [[subgroup]] if you want to. It doesn’t matter that it’s less [[concordant]] than 2.3.5.7. Explore it anyway and see what happens. Do some stuff with [[:Category:Novelties|arbitrary numbers]] that don’t make logical sense and just see what comes of it. That’s where the fun is! (Though maybe keep a “2.3” or “3.5” in there just to smooth over the gnarliest edges, heehee.) | ||
* I would prefer to use a temperament [[Temperament naming|named]] something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “countertrihexakleismatic” even if it’s super [[damage|accurate]] and technically [[badness|better]] - a bland name can kill a temperament’s appeal, a fun name can create appeal out of nothing. | * I would prefer to use a temperament [[Temperament naming|named]] something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “countertrihexakleismatic” even if it’s super [[damage|accurate]] and technically [[badness|better]] - a bland name can kill a temperament’s appeal, a fun name can create appeal out of nothing. | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> |