Survey of efficient temperaments by subgroup: Difference between revisions
Resolve comment: you are correct, Lupercalia should be in the 30 note category, thank you for moving it :) |
m →Table of temperaments (5 to 45 notes per equave): remove Ogene from some rows (incorrect number of note estimate made it less special than it initially appeared) |
||
| Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
! 19-limit <br>(2 . 3 . 5 . 7 . 11 . 13 . 17 . 19) | ! 19-limit <br>(2 . 3 . 5 . 7 . 11 . 13 . 17 . 19) | ||
| | | | ||
| | | [[niner]]++ | ||
| [[wilsec]], [[winston]]++, [[augene]]++, [[sensis]]++ | | [[wilsec]], [[winston]]++, [[augene]]++, [[sensis]]++ | ||
| [[roman]]++, [[mohajira]], [[lupercalia]]++, [[superpyth]]++, [[negroni]]++, [[meanenneadecal]], [[ringo]]++, [[injera]], [[meantoid]] | | [[roman]]++, [[mohajira]], [[lupercalia]]++, [[superpyth]]++, [[negroni]]++, [[meanenneadecal]], [[ringo]]++, [[injera]], [[meantoid]] | ||
| Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| [[lupercalia]]+++, [[negroni]]+++, [[injera]]+ | | [[lupercalia]]+++, [[negroni]]+++, [[injera]]+ | ||
|- | |- | ||