User:Tremend/WIP: Difference between revisions
WIP |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
First, responding to Barium Unque on "wibblepoints" and "adaptive harmony":<blockquote>First of all, hello, Barium | First, responding to Barium Unque on "wibblepoints" and "adaptive harmony":<blockquote>First of all, hello, Barium | ||
Yes, Wibblepoints could parallel how slight pitch adjustments are used in common-practice music, like the third in chords or leading tones in traditional harmony. However, Wibblepoints differ by how I defined it in previous text: they’re intentional, nuanced microtonal reference points that emerge within the ''context of non-standard scales''. Unlike “adaptive harmony” in common practice, where tonal adjustments are largely intuitive | Yes, Wibblepoints could parallel how slight pitch adjustments are used in common-practice music, like the third in chords or leading tones in traditional harmony. However, Wibblepoints differ by how I defined it in previous text: they’re intentional, nuanced microtonal reference points that emerge within the ''context of non-standard scales''. Unlike “adaptive harmony” in common practice, where tonal adjustments are largely intuitive, Wibblepoints are EXPLICTLY structured intervals within alternative tunings, they're not merely interpretative, they’re designed into the lattice. I named wibblepoints like that, because as silly as it may sound, "wibble" sounds like a silly word for "slight bounce" or "wiggle".</blockquote> | ||