User:Dave Keenan/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Dave Keenan (talk | contribs)
Dave Keenan (talk | contribs)
Line 102: Line 102:
| colspan="2" | {{sagittal| (|\ }} || jakai || 3/5, 2/3, 3/4
| colspan="2" | {{sagittal| (|\ }} || jakai || 3/5, 2/3, 3/4
|-
|-
| E-F{{nbhsp}}{{sagittal|  !( }} || {{sagittal| ||) }}|| eef nao || 4/5, 5/6
| E-F{{nbhsp}}{{sagittal|  !( }} || {{sagittal| ||) }}|| ief nao || 4/5, 5/6
|-
|-
| E-F || {{sagittal| ||\ }}|| eef || 1
| E-F || {{sagittal| ||\ }}|| ief || 1
|}
|}


The corresponding down notations replace E-F with F-E (or B-C with C-B) and mirror the sagittals vertically, while their pronunciations replace "eef" with "fee" and swap "ai" (high) and "ao" (down) endings. The names "eef" and "fee" come from the interval E-F being a limma.  
The corresponding down notations replace E-F with F-E (or B-C with C-B) and mirror the sagittals vertically, while their pronunciations replace "ief" with "efee" and swap "ai" (high) and "ao" (down) endings. The pronunciations "ief" and "efee" come from the interval E-F being a limma.  


The following table shows all the rose EDOs/ETs. Notice how the notation of subsets is preserved; there are never two different symbols in the same column.
The following table shows all the rose EDOs/ETs. Notice how the notation of subsets is preserved; there are never two different symbols in the same column.
Line 115: Line 115:
|-
|-
|-
|-
! rowspan="2" | EDOs<br />b-ETs !! rowspan="2" | [[Sharpness#eefness|eEFness]] !! colspan="13" | Limma fraction 
! rowspan="2" | EDOs<br />b-ETs !! rowspan="2" | [[Sharpness#EF-ness|EF-ness]] !! colspan="13" | Limma fraction 
|-
|-
! 0  !! 1/6 !! 1/5 !! 1/4 !! 1/3 !! 2/5 !! 1/2 !! 3/5 !! 2/3 !! 3/4 !! 4/5 !! 5/6 !!  1 
! 0  !! 1/6 !! 1/5 !! 1/4 !! 1/3 !! 2/5 !! 1/2 !! 3/5 !! 2/3 !! 3/4 !! 4/5 !! 5/6 !!  1