User:Dave Keenan/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Dave Keenan (talk | contribs)
Dave Keenan (talk | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:


=== Bad-fifths apotome-fraction notation ===
=== Bad-fifths apotome-fraction notation ===
This notation is used for EDOs with fifths of 712.5 cents or more. These are the gold EDOs on the [https://sagittal.org/#periodic-table Periodic Table], except that EDOs 6, 8, 13, and 18 are usually notated as subsets of larger EDOs.
This notation is used for EDOs with fifths of 712.5 cents or more. These are the gold EDOs on the [https://sagittal.org/#periodic-table Periodic Table].


{| class="wikitable center-all"
{| class="wikitable center-all"
Line 79: Line 79:
| 64b || 10 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || {{sagittal| (|\ }} || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || {{sagittal| /||\ }}
| 64b || 10 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || {{sagittal| (|\ }} || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || {{sagittal| /||\ }}
|}
|}
EDOs in parentheses (6), (8), (13), and (18) have fifths that are so wide that they are usually notated as subsets of larger EDOs with good fifths. [59]-EDO is in square brackets because it is green not rose on the periodic table, and so it has a JI-based notation. However, its fifth is very close to the bad-fifth threshold and its 1-step symbol is only justified by the apotome-fraction notation, so its notation is a hybrid.


=== Bad-fifths limma-fraction notation ===
=== Bad-fifths limma-fraction notation ===