User:Dave Keenan/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) moved pronunciation to apotome page itself |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) →History: extract link to footnote |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[Chain-of-fifths_notation#Accidentals|Stein-Zimmermann notation]] can be viewed as a very simple apotome-fraction notation, notating only half-apotomes. | [[Chain-of-fifths_notation#Accidentals|Stein-Zimmermann notation]] can be viewed as a very simple apotome-fraction notation, notating only half-apotomes. | ||
In 2016,<ref>https://www.facebook.com/groups/497105067092502/permalink/840445019425170</ref> [[Cryptic Ruse]] introduced the idea of using a combination of apotome-fraction and limma-fraction notations to cover all EDOs up to 72. This may have been the first proposal of a limma fraction notation. | |||
When the EDO has fifths so narrow that the apotome becomes very small or negative (e.g. 33-EDO), a limma-fraction notation must be used. When the EDO has fifths so wide that the limma becomes very small or negative (e.g. 32-EDO), an apotome-fraction notation must be used. | When the EDO has fifths so narrow that the apotome becomes very small or negative (e.g. 33-EDO), a limma-fraction notation must be used. When the EDO has fifths so wide that the limma becomes very small or negative (e.g. 32-EDO), an apotome-fraction notation must be used. | ||