Ed4/3: Difference between revisions
Contribution (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Contribution (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Incidentally, one way to treat 4/3 as an equivalence is the use of the 12:13:14:(16) chord as the fundamental complete sonority in a very similar way to the 4:5:6:(8) chord in [[meantone]]. Whereas in meantone it takes (an octave-reduced stack of) four [[3/2]] to get to [[5/4]], here it takes (a fourth-reduced stack of) eight [[7/6]] to get to [[13/12]] (tempering out the comma [[5764801/5750784]]). So, doing this yields 13-, 15-, and 28-note [[mos scale]]s for ed4/3's. While the notes are rather closer together, the scheme is uncannily similar to meantone. | Incidentally, one way to treat 4/3 as an equivalence is the use of the 12:13:14:(16) chord as the fundamental complete sonority in a very similar way to the 4:5:6:(8) chord in [[meantone]]. Whereas in meantone it takes (an octave-reduced stack of) four [[3/2]] to get to [[5/4]], here it takes (a fourth-reduced stack of) eight [[7/6]] to get to [[13/12]] (tempering out the comma [[5764801/5750784]]). So, doing this yields 13-, 15-, and 28-note [[mos scale]]s for ed4/3's. While the notes are rather closer together, the scheme is uncannily similar to meantone. | ||
== Individual pages for ed4/3s == | == Individual pages for ed4/3s == |