User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio: Difference between revisions

Line 6:

: Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I haven't had a chance to read the contents of the link you posted yet (but I just checked to make sure that it is possible for me to do so). Let me get back to you after the CrowdStrike mess is cleaned up at work. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 02:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

: Actually got a chance to read it after all before I go back to work tomorrow (this DOESN'T mean that I am done with the CrowdStrike fiasco). The names are confusing and hard to remember, but when you have numbers (including increments of EDOs), it starts to make sense. Note that it would help A LOT to move the graph of intervals up so that readers see that around the time you start naming scale degrees, as opposed to long afterwards. As for Pythagorean intervals, I have recently been thinking that it would be good to extend the table of Pythagorean intervals (of which a semi-extended version is currently found under [[3-limit]]) up to 53 notes, also including higher-limit intervals and the differences between these and the Pythagorean intervals. Probably should go into a different article from 3-limit, though -- would like to see Xenharmonic Wiki get an Extended Pythagorean Tuning article. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 04:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:42, 22 July 2024 view source Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk \| contribs) 2,821 edits →Functional Harmony: Temporary reply ← Older edit		Revision as of 04:17, 22 July 2024 view source Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk \| contribs) 2,821 edits →Functional Harmony: Reply after reading link Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I haven't had a chance to read the contents of the link you posted yet (but I just checked to make sure that it is possible for me to do so). Let me get back to you after the CrowdStrike mess is cleaned up at work. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 02:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)		: Sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I haven't had a chance to read the contents of the link you posted yet (but I just checked to make sure that it is possible for me to do so). Let me get back to you after the CrowdStrike mess is cleaned up at work. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 02:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
			: Actually got a chance to read it after all before I go back to work tomorrow (this DOESN'T mean that I am done with the CrowdStrike fiasco). The names are confusing and hard to remember, but when you have numbers (including increments of EDOs), it starts to make sense. Note that it would help A LOT to move the graph of intervals up so that readers see that around the time you start naming scale degrees, as opposed to long afterwards. As for Pythagorean intervals, I have recently been thinking that it would be good to extend the table of Pythagorean intervals (of which a semi-extended version is currently found under [[3-limit]]) up to 53 notes, also including higher-limit intervals and the differences between these and the Pythagorean intervals. Probably should go into a different article from 3-limit, though -- would like to see Xenharmonic Wiki get an Extended Pythagorean Tuning article. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 04:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)